These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3233248)

  • 1. Using jackknife methods for estimating the parameter in dilution series.
    Does RJ; Strijbosch LW; Albers W
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1093-102. PubMed ID: 3233248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limiting dilution assays. Experimental design and statistical analysis.
    Strijbosch LW; Buurman WA; Does RJ; Zinken PH; Groenewegen G
    J Immunol Methods; 1987 Feb; 97(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 3819436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jackknife estimators of variance for parameter estimates from estimating equations with applications to clustered survival data.
    Lipsitz SR; Dear KB; Zhao L
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):842-6. PubMed ID: 7981404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating equations with incomplete categorical covariates in the Cox model.
    Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1002-13. PubMed ID: 9750248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust elementwise estimation of a dispersion matrix.
    Mehrotra DV
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1344-51. PubMed ID: 8589226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies. I. Data analysis.
    Taswell C
    J Immunol; 1981 Apr; 126(4):1614-9. PubMed ID: 7009746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the species accumulation curve using mixtures.
    Mao CX; Colwell RK; Chang J
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):433-41. PubMed ID: 16011689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability.
    Chao A
    Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):783-91. PubMed ID: 3427163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice of number of doses for maximum likelihood estimation of the ED50 for quantal dose-response data.
    Müller HG; Schmitt T
    Biometrics; 1990 Mar; 46(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 2350566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scoredist: a simple and robust protein sequence distance estimator.
    Sonnhammer EL; Hollich V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():108. PubMed ID: 15857510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The maximally exposed individual--comparison of maximum likelihood estimation of high quantiles to an extreme value estimate.
    Wilson MD; McCormick WP; Hinton TG
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1143-51. PubMed ID: 15563284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incomplete generalized U-statistics for food risk assessment.
    Bertail P; Tressou J
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 16542231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating survival curves with left-truncated and interval-censored data under monotone hazards.
    Pan W; Chappell R
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1053-60. PubMed ID: 9750251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small-sample confidence sets for the MTD in a phase I clinical trial.
    Storer BE
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1117-25. PubMed ID: 8117905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of three methods for calculating confidence intervals for the benchmark dose.
    Moerbeek M; Piersma AH; Slob W
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 15027998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for estimating and testing area under the curve in serial sacrifice, batch, and complete data designs.
    Holder DJ; Hsuan F; Dixit R; Soper K
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Aug; 9(3):451-64. PubMed ID: 10473031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method for estimating uncertainty arising from shared errors in exposures in epidemiological studies of nuclear workers.
    Stayner L; Vrijheid M; Cardis E; Stram DO; Deltour I; Gilbert SJ; Howe G
    Radiat Res; 2007 Dec; 168(6):757-63. PubMed ID: 18088178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
    Saha KK; Paul SR
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.