BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3233249)

  • 1. Kernel estimates of dose response.
    Staniswalis JG; Cooper V
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1103-19. PubMed ID: 3233249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Small-sample confidence limits for parameters under inequality constraints with application to quantal bioassay.
    Morris MD
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1083-92. PubMed ID: 3233247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interval estimation of the LD50 based on an up-and-down experiment.
    Choi SC
    Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 2364133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient design for estimation of median lethal dose and quantal dose-response curves.
    Kalish LA
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):737-48. PubMed ID: 2242412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidence intervals of effect size for paired studies.
    Wu J; Jiang G
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 17634978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-parametric estimators of a monotonic dose-response curve and bootstrap confidence intervals.
    Dilleen M; Heimann G; Hirsch I
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 12627406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximate simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple contrasts of binomial proportions.
    Schaarschmidt F; Sill M; Hothorn LA
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 18932137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiplicity-adjusted inferences in risk assessment: benchmark analysis with quantal response data.
    Nitcheva DK; Piegorsch WW; West RW; Kodell RL
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):277-86. PubMed ID: 15737104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sharp simultaneous confidence intervals for the means of selected populations with application to microarray data analysis.
    Qiu J; Hwang JT
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 17403105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining the error of dose estimates and minimum and maximum acceptable concentrations from assays with nonlinear dose-response curves.
    Gottschalk PG; Dunn JR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 16256244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonparametric methods for measurements below detection limit.
    Zhang D; Fan C; Zhang J; Zhang CH
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):700-15. PubMed ID: 19035469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact analysis of dose response for multiple correlated binary outcomes.
    Han KE; Catalano PJ; Senchaudhuri P; Mehta C
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 15032792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose-time-response cumulative multinomial generalized linear model.
    Chen DG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):173-85. PubMed ID: 17219762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A parametric model for detecting hormetic effects in developmental toxicity studies.
    Hunt DL; Bowman D
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15028001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A shared response model for clustered binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
    Pang Z; Kuk AY
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1076-84. PubMed ID: 16401281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A measure of tumorigenic potency incorporating dose-response shape.
    Meier KL; Bailer AJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):917-26. PubMed ID: 8241378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A two-stage stepwise estimation procedure.
    Chen JT
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 18325070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.