These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3233249)

  • 41. Five interval estimators for proportion ratio under a stratified randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):613-26. PubMed ID: 17634977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dose-dependent number of implants and implications in developmental toxicity.
    Dunson DB
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):558-69. PubMed ID: 9629644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Precision of benchmark dose estimates for continuous (nonquantal) measurements of toxic effects.
    Gaylor DW; Chen JJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 24(1 Pt 1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8921542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Trimmed logit method for estimating the ED50 in quantal bioassay.
    Sanathanan LP; Gade ET; Shipkowitz NL
    Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 3427167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Population size estimation in a two-list surveillance system with a discrete covariate.
    You N; Xuan Mao C
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 18325071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Confidence intervals for the 50 per cent response dose.
    Faraggi D; Izikson P; Reiser B
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(12):1977-88. PubMed ID: 12802816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A nonparametric procedure for the two-factor mixed model with missing data.
    Gao X
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):774-88. PubMed ID: 17634980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sensitivity analysis for m-estimates, tests, and confidence intervals in matched observational studies.
    Rosenbaum PR
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 17688498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression.
    Hertz-Picciotto I; Rockhill B
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1151-6. PubMed ID: 9333345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multivariate extensions of McNemar's test.
    Klingenberg B; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):921-8. PubMed ID: 16984337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Choice of number of doses for maximum likelihood estimation of the ED50 for quantal dose-response data.
    Müller HG; Schmitt T
    Biometrics; 1990 Mar; 46(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 2350566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accurate confidence limits for quantiles under random censoring.
    Strawderman RL; Parzen MI; Wells MT
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1399-415. PubMed ID: 9423256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Population one-compartment pharmacokinetic analysis with missing dosage data.
    Soy D; Beal SL; Sheiner LB
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2004 Nov; 76(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 15536459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimating derivatives of pharmacokinetic response curves with varying bandwidths.
    Song KS; Müller HG; Clifford AJ; Furr HC; Olson JA
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 7766769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Applications and extensions of Chao's moment estimator for the size of a closed population.
    Rivest LP; Baillargeon S
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):999-1006. PubMed ID: 17425635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator in up-and-down experiments for quantal dose-response data.
    Vågerö M; Sundberg R
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Aug; 9(3):499-519. PubMed ID: 10473034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Summarizing EC50 estimates from multiple dose-response experiments: a comparison of a meta-analysis strategy to a mixed-effects model approach.
    Jiang X; Kopp-Schneider A
    Biom J; 2014 May; 56(3):493-512. PubMed ID: 24478144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A note on the small sample behavior of logistic regression in a bioassay setting.
    Nottingham QJ; Birch JB
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 9855034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An unbalanced experimental design for dose response studies.
    Farmer JH; Uhler RJ; Haley TJ
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1977; 1(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 553136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Monotone smoothing with application to dose-response curves and the assessment of synergism.
    Kelly C; Rice J
    Biometrics; 1990 Dec; 46(4):1071-85. PubMed ID: 2085626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.