40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32332545)
1. Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study.
Wang TH; Chen YF; Chen YA; Yao CF; Xi T; Liao YF; Chen YR
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):334. PubMed ID: 38780816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between one-jaw and two-jaw designs in virtual surgery planning for patients with class III malocclusion.
Hattori Y; Pai BC; Lo CC; Chou PY; Lo LJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 May; 52(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 38448337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-designed three-dimensional printed skeletal anchorage titanium device for orthopaedic traction in a growing Class III patient.
Pang SL; Wong KF; Lin Y; Leung YY
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 124(6S2):101571. PubMed ID: 37499905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and influencing factors of maxillary and mandibular repositioning using pre-bent locking plates: a prospective study.
Imai H; Yamashita Y; Takasu H; Fujita K; Ono T; Hirota M; Mitsudo K
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 61(10):659-665. PubMed ID: 37863724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of patient-specific implants versus CAD/CAM splints with the mandible-first approach in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Yan J; Li B; Zhang C; Qian Y; Li Z; Wang X
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38834408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does Condylar Morphology Affect Maxillary Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery?
Takahara N; Tomomatsu N; Kachi H; Iwasaki T; Maruta N; Yoda T
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38752759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided Design and Syringe-aided Manufacturing for Mandibular Reconstruction Using a Vascularized Fibula Flap.
Karakawa R; Yano T; Yoshimatsu H; Katsuta H; Kushihashi Y; Shimane T
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 May; 8(5):e2819. PubMed ID: 33133895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative stability of bioresorbable plates made of 85:15 poly (L-lactide-co-glycolide) in Le Fort I osteotomy.
Tomomatsu N; Takahara N; Akaike Y; Sato Y; Kurasawa Y; Yoda T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Nov; 136(5):569-576. PubMed ID: 37640562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of hard and soft tissue prediction using three-dimensional simulation software in bimaxillary osteotomies: A systematic review.
Tabchi Y; Zaoui F; Bahoum A
Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100802. PubMed ID: 37499444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach.
Numajiri T; Morita D; Nakamura H; Yamochi R; Tsujiko S; Sowa Y
J Vis Exp; 2018 Aug; (138):. PubMed ID: 30199014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the feasibility of minimally invasive Le Fort I with patient-specific implants: Proof of concept.
Hernández-Alfaro F; Saavedra O; Duran-Vallès F; Valls-Ontañón A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 125(3S):101844. PubMed ID: 38556164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted planning and patient-specific plates in orthognathic surgery: a global study.
Karwowska NN; Baron M; Stern-Buchbinder Z; Buchbinder D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):673-680. PubMed ID: 37612163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced Precision in Genioplasty: A Novel Intraoperative Spatial Repositioning Using Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Technology and a Holographic Mixed Reality Application.
Koyachi M; Sugahara K; Tachizawa K; Nishiyama A; Odaka K; Matsunaga S; Sugimoto M; Tachiki C; Nishii Y; Katakura A
J Clin Med; 2023 Nov; 12(23):. PubMed ID: 38068460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contemporary Surgical Management of Craniofacial Fibrous Dysplasia Using Computer-Assisted Surgery and Intraoperative Navigation.
Best DL; Lee KC; Reynolds RM; Piccillo E; Behar P; Markiewicz MR
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):1280-1283. PubMed ID: 38738867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design and manufacture of dental-supported surgical guide for genioplasty.
Wang LD; Ma W; Fu S; Zhang CB; Cui QY; Peng CB; Li M
J Dent Sci; 2021 Jan; 16(1):417-423. PubMed ID: 33384829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Patient-Specific Condylar Positioning Devices and Manual Methods in Orthognathic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Straub A; Gubik S; Kübler A; Breitenbuecher N; Vollmer A; Renner T; Müller-Richter U; Hartmann S; Brands R
J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38337431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Cutting and Drilling Guides with Prebent Titanium Plates Improve Surgical Accuracy of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion.
Li K; Li J; Du W; Xu C; Ye B; Luo E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):963e-974e. PubMed ID: 32332545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided design and computer-aided modeling (CAD/CAM) generated surgical splints, cutting guides and custom-made implants: Which indications in orthognathic surgery?
Scolozzi P
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2015 Dec; 116(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 26598243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing cutting guides and customized titanium plates are useful in upper maxilla waferless repositioning.
Mazzoni S; Bianchi A; Schiariti G; Badiali G; Marchetti C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 25622881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
