These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32333106)

  • 1. The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1757-1775. PubMed ID: 32333106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
    Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence.
    Maxwell NP; Cates EE; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):1023-1044. PubMed ID: 37926731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.
    Hu X; Liu Z; Li T; Luo L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 25686085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reactivity from judgments of learning is not only due to memory forecasting: evidence from associative memory and frequency judgments.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Metacogn Learn; 2022; 17(2):589-625. PubMed ID: 35505852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; Janes JL; Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1547-1561. PubMed ID: 37173589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; McCabe DP; Roediger HL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 17546739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do judgments of learning modify older adults' actual learning?
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):836-847. PubMed ID: 31259565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
    Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is discriminability a requirement for reactivity? Comparing the effects of mixed vs. pure list presentations on judgment of learning reactivity.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jul; 51(5):1198-1213. PubMed ID: 36576684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating memory reactivity with a within-participant manipulation of judgments of learning: support for the cue-strengthening hypothesis.
    Rivers ML; Janes JL; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1342-1353. PubMed ID: 34635008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.
    Zimdahl MF; Undorf M
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sensitivity of judgment-of-learning resolution to past test performance, new learning, and forgetting.
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 21264621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.
    Halamish V; Undorf M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.