These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32333126)

  • 1. The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation.
    Pluviano S; Della Sala S; Watt C
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 32333126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forming and updating vaccination beliefs: does the continued effect of misinformation depend on what we think we know?
    Pluviano S; Watt C; Pompéia S; Ekuni R; Della Sala S
    Cogn Process; 2022 Aug; 23(3):367-378. PubMed ID: 35583578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect.
    Ecker UKH; Antonio LM
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):631-644. PubMed ID: 33452666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.
    Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility.
    Kemp PL; Goldman AC; Wahlheim CN
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101783. PubMed ID: 38171060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon.
    Swire B; Berinsky AJ; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UK
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Mar; 4(3):160802. PubMed ID: 28405366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines.
    Zhang J; Featherstone JD; Calabrese C; Wojcieszak M
    Prev Med; 2021 Apr; 145():106408. PubMed ID: 33388335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parents' beliefs in misinformation about vaccines are strengthened by pro-vaccine campaigns.
    Pluviano S; Watt C; Ragazzini G; Della Sala S
    Cogn Process; 2019 Aug; 20(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 30963330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Credible narrators and misinformed readers.
    Houghton KJ; Poirier RC; Klin CM
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):825-844. PubMed ID: 36450939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.
    Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of school nurses and personnel and associations with nonmedical immunization exemptions.
    Salmon DA; Moulton LH; Omer SB; Chace LM; Klassen A; Talebian P; Halsey NA
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jun; 113(6):e552-9. PubMed ID: 15173536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correcting eyewitness suggestibility: does explanatory role predict resistance to correction?
    Braun BE; Zaragoza MS; Chrobak QM; Ithisuphalap J
    Memory; 2021 Jan; 29(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 33290185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The independent effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on retraction believability: The moderating role of vested interest.
    Susmann MW; Wegener DT
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):845-861. PubMed ID: 36460863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting vaccine misinformation: A failure to replicate familiarity or fear-driven backfire effects.
    Ecker UKH; Sharkey CXM; Swire-Thompson B
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0281140. PubMed ID: 37043493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
    Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory failure predicts belief regression after the correction of misinformation.
    Swire-Thompson B; Dobbs M; Thomas A; DeGutis J
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105276. PubMed ID: 36174261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation.
    Xu Y; Wong R; He S; Veldre A; Andrews S
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1112-1127. PubMed ID: 32430888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning misinformation from fictional sources: understanding the contributions of transportation and item-specific processing.
    Fazio LK; Dolan PO; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2015; 23(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 24499200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Credibility of misinformation source moderates the effectiveness of corrective messages on social media.
    Zeng HK; Lo SY; Li SS
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jul; 33(5):587-603. PubMed ID: 38160402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-Correction or Other-Correction: The Effects of Source Consistency and Ways of Correction on Sharing Intention of Health Misinformation Correction.
    Sun J; Pan W
    Health Commun; 2024 Apr; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 38659151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.