263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32333364)
1. Learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children: how to reach a level of excellence?
Dothan D; Raisin G; Jaber J; Kocherov S; Chertin B
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 32333364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?
Kafka IZ; Kocherov S; Jaber J; Chertin B
Pediatr Surg Int; 2019 Mar; 35(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 30643964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons.
Spampinato G; Binet A; Fourcade L; Mendoza Sagaon M; Villemagne T; Braik K; Grosos C; Lardy H; Ballouhey Q
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Apr; 31(4):478-483. PubMed ID: 33651635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus open pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: a single center experience in Saudi Arabia.
Junejo NN; Vallasciani S; Alshammari A; Aljallad H; Alshahrani S; Abasher A; Almathami A; Alhazmi H
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Oct; 70(5):486-493. PubMed ID: 29856170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
Silay MS; Spinoit AF; Undre S; Fiala V; Tandogdu Z; Garmanova T; Guttilla A; Sancaktutar AA; Haid B; Waldert M; Goyal A; Serefoglu EC; Baldassarre E; Manzoni G; Radford A; Subramaniam R; Cherian A; Hoebeke P; Jacobs M; Rocco B; Yuriy R; Zattoni F; Kocvara R; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a multi-outcome approach.
Kassite I; Braik K; Villemagne T; Lardy H; Binet A
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):570.e1-570.e10. PubMed ID: 30177385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Compared to Open Repair in Infants under 1 Year of Age.
Rague JT; Arora HC; Chu DI; Shannon R; Rosoklija I; Johnson EK; Gong EM; Lindgren BW
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):432-440. PubMed ID: 34551596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of robotic-assisted laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children: single-surgeon experience.
Murthy P; Cohn JA; Gundeti MS
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Mar; 97(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 25723686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).
González ST; Rosito TE; Tur AB; Ruiz J; Gozalbez R; Maiolo A; Tavares PM; Gorgen ARH; de Kencht EL; Madarriaga YQ; Weller S; Tobia IP; Castellan M; Corbetta JP
Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(6):961-968. PubMed ID: 36083265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study.
O'Brien ST; Shukla AR
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21616719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic surgery start-up with a fellow as the console surgeon.
Reinhardt S; Ifaoui IB; Thorup J
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):335-338. PubMed ID: 28398104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.
Zhou L; Huang J; Xie H; Chen F
J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):97. PubMed ID: 38413450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.
Chandrasekharam VVS; Babu R
J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Oct; 18(5):642-649. PubMed ID: 36117037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery.
Salö M; Sjöberg Altemani T; Anderberg M
Pediatr Surg Int; 2016 Jun; 32(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 26833312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
Andolfi C; Adamic B; Oommen J; Gundeti MS
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31506749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children.
Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort.
Bansal D; Cost NG; DeFoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Vanderbrink BA; Alam S; Sheldon CA; Noh PH
J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Apr; 10(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 24268880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic pyeloplasty learning curve for a pediatric surgeon without previous laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience.
Planchamp T; Bento L; Mouttalib S; Belbahri I; Coustets B; Aissa DA; Abbo O
J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2955-2962. PubMed ID: 37864128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]