These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32333654)

  • 1. Atenolol removal by nanofiltration: a case-specific mass transfer correlation.
    Giacobbo A; Soares EV; Bernardes AM; Rosa MJ; de Pinho MN
    Water Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 81(2):210-216. PubMed ID: 32333654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence of solute-solute interactions and cake enhanced concentration polarization during removal of pharmaceuticals from urban wastewater by nanofiltration.
    Azaïs A; Mendret J; Petit E; Brosillon S
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():156-167. PubMed ID: 27522026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of atenolol from single and binary aqueous solutions by thin film composite nanofiltration membrane: Transport modeling and pore radius estimation.
    Taheri E; Hadi S; Amin MM; Ebrahimi A; Fatehizadeh A; Aminabhavi TM
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 271():111005. PubMed ID: 32778290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concentration Polarization in Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration for the Recovery of Polyphenols from Winery Wastewaters.
    Giacobbo A; Moura Bernardes A; Filipe Rosa MJ; de Pinho MN
    Membranes (Basel); 2018 Jul; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 30037095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of pH on Atenolol/Nanofiltration Membranes Affinity.
    Soares EV; Giacobbo A; Rodrigues MAS; de Pinho MN; Bernardes AM
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34564506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of feed solution characteristics and membrane fouling on the removal of THMs by UF/NF/RO membranes.
    Fang C; Ou T; Wang X; Rui M; Chu W
    Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127625. PubMed ID: 32758776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling of arsenic (III) removal from aqueous solution using film theory combined Spiegler-Kedem model: pilot-scale study.
    Rajendran RM; Garg S; Bajpai S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):13886-13899. PubMed ID: 33205270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control systems for olive mill wastewater treatment with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane in series based on the boundary flux theory.
    Ochando-Pulido JM
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):2968-2978. PubMed ID: 29210684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
    Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of organic fouling layer on the rejection of trace organic solutes by nanofiltration: mechanisms and implications.
    Gan Z; Du X; Zhu X; Cheng X; Li G; Liang H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):33827-33837. PubMed ID: 29948687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recovery of clindamycin from fermentation wastewater with nanofiltration membranes.
    Zhu A; Zhu W; Wu Z; Jing Y
    Water Res; 2003 Sep; 37(15):3718-32. PubMed ID: 12867340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A flux-enhancing forward osmosis-nanofiltration integrated treatment system for the tannery wastewater reclamation.
    Pal P; Chakrabortty S; Nayak J; Senapati S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jun; 24(18):15768-15780. PubMed ID: 28528503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nanofiltration as tertiary treatment method for removing trace pharmaceutically active compounds in wastewater from wastewater treatment plants.
    Garcia-Ivars J; Martella L; Massella M; Carbonell-Alcaina C; Alcaina-Miranda MI; Iborra-Clar MI
    Water Res; 2017 Nov; 125():360-373. PubMed ID: 28881212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nanofiltration performances after membrane bioreactor for hospital wastewater treatment: Fouling mechanisms and the quantitative link between stable fluxes and the water matrix.
    Lan Y; Groenen-Serrano K; Coetsier C; Causserand C
    Water Res; 2018 Dec; 146():77-87. PubMed ID: 30236467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fabrication of asymmetric poly (m-phenylene isophthalamide) nanofiltration membrane for chromium (VI) removal.
    Ren X; Zhao C; Du S; Wang T; Luan Z; Wang J; Hou D
    J Environ Sci (China); 2010; 22(9):1335-41. PubMed ID: 21174963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impacts of operating conditions on nanofiltration of secondary-treated two-phase olive mill wastewater.
    Ochando Pulido JM; Martínez Férez A
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():219-227. PubMed ID: 26186549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of feed water pH and membrane material on nanofiltration of perfluorohexanoic acid in aqueous solution.
    Zeng C; Tanaka S; Suzuki Y; Fujii S
    Chemosphere; 2017 Sep; 183():599-604. PubMed ID: 28575703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ozonation as a pretreatment process for nanofiltration brines: Monitoring of transformation products and toxicity evaluation.
    Azaïs A; Mendret J; Cazals G; Petit E; Brosillon S
    J Hazard Mater; 2017 Sep; 338():381-393. PubMed ID: 28586753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.