BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32333655)

  • 1. Enhancing treated wastewater effluent characteristics using hybrid biofilm/activated sludge process - a case study.
    Hassan K; Hamdy O; Helmy M; Mostafa H
    Water Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 81(2):217-227. PubMed ID: 32333655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upgrading of an activated sludge wastewater treatment plant by adding a moving bed biofilm reactor as pre-treatment and ozonation followed by biofiltration for enhanced COD reduction: design and operation experience.
    Kaindl N
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(11):2710-9. PubMed ID: 21099060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mathematical modelling and comparative analysis of treatment technologies for upgrading wastewater treatment plants: A case study of biofilm reactors in El-Gouna, Egypt.
    Osama A; Kinnawy MA; Moussa MS; Riechelmann C; Hosney H
    Environ Res; 2023 Dec; 238(Pt 1):117008. PubMed ID: 37669734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trace organic contaminant removal in six full-scale integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) systems treating municipal wastewater.
    Shreve MJ; Brennan RA
    Water Res; 2019 Mar; 151():318-331. PubMed ID: 30616044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of hybrid fixed and moving bed biofilm applications for wastewater treatment capacity increase - In situ tests in El-Gouna WWTP, Egypt.
    Riechelmann C; Habashy MM; Rene ER; Moussa MS; Hosney H
    Chemosphere; 2024 May; 355():139783. PubMed ID: 37574084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor.
    Tawfik A; El-Gohary F; Temmink H
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Feb; 33(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 19404682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the performance of MBBR and SBR systems for the treatment of anaerobic reactor biowaste effluent.
    Comett-Ambriz I; Gonzalez-Martinez S; Wilderer P
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):155-61. PubMed ID: 12926683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compact secondary treatment train combining a lab-scale moving bed biofilm reactor and enhanced flotation processes.
    Brosseau C; Émile B; Labelle MA; Laflamme É; Dold PL; Comeau Y
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():571-582. PubMed ID: 27776306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Optimization of the Nitrogen Removal Performance on the CANON Process in a Biofilm Reactor: From FBBR to MBBR].
    Fu KM; Li H; Zhou HT; Qiu FG
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 May; 39(5):2256-2264. PubMed ID: 29965526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wastewater treatment using moving bed biofilm reactor technology: a case study of ceramic industry.
    Pethe A; Debnath M
    Water Environ Res; 2024 Apr; 96(4):e11026. PubMed ID: 38641883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of organics from shale gas fracturing flowback fluid using expanded granular sludge bed and moving bed biofilm reactor.
    Sun Y; Huang L; Lai C; Li H; Yang P
    Environ Technol; 2021 Oct; 42(24):3736-3746. PubMed ID: 32149585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wastewater treatment in a hybrid activated sludge baffled reactor.
    Tizghadam M; Dagot C; Baudu M
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 154(1-3):550-7. PubMed ID: 18078710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dairy wastewater treatment in a moving bed biofilm reactor.
    Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ragazzi M; Villa R
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):321-8. PubMed ID: 12201118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Start-up of membrane bioreactor and hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor: kinetic study.
    Leyva-Díaz JC; Poyatos JM
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(11):1948-53. PubMed ID: 26606088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Upgrading sequencing batch reactor using attached biofilm.
    Abdelaziz HA; Fouad M; Mossad M
    Water Environ Res; 2021 Sep; 93(9):1700-1713. PubMed ID: 33720481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increasing the capacity for treatment of chemical plant wastewater by replacing existing suspended carrier media with Kaldnes Moving Bed media at a plant in Singapore.
    Wessman FG; Yan Yuegen E; Zheng Q; He G; Welander T; Rusten B
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):199-205. PubMed ID: 15303742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nitrite accumulation performance of aerobic MBBR treating Lurgi coal gasification waste water by adjusting pollutant load and DO concentration.
    Li HQ; Han HJ
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(24):3210-20. PubMed ID: 26111205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nitrogen and carbon removal efficiency of a polyvinyl alcohol gel based moving bed biofilm reactor system.
    Gani KM; Singh J; Singh NK; Ali M; Rose V; Kazmi AA
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(7):1511-9. PubMed ID: 27054722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal of pharmaceuticals in conventionally treated wastewater by a polishing moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) with intermittent feeding.
    Tang K; Ooi GTH; Litty K; Sundmark K; Kaarsholm KMS; Sund C; Kragelund C; Christensson M; Bester K; Andersen HR
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jul; 236():77-86. PubMed ID: 28390280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.