These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32333687)

  • 21. [Rationing, prioritisation, rationalizing: Significance in everyday intensive care].
    Gretenkort P
    Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2015 Nov; 110(8):609-13. PubMed ID: 25410664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: a cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors.
    Bringedal B; Feiring E
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 37(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 21335575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Who is in and who is out? A qualitative analysis of stakeholder participation in priority setting for health in three districts in Uganda.
    Razavi SD; Kapiriri L; Abelson J; Wilson M
    Health Policy Plan; 2019 Jun; 34(5):358-369. PubMed ID: 31180489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle.
    Altmann S
    J Med Ethics; 2018 May; 44(5):305-309. PubMed ID: 29321220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Ethical basis of priority setting in healthcare].
    Marckmann G
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Sep; 53(9):867-73. PubMed ID: 20853082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR DECISION MAKING IN LATIN AMERICA: GOOD PRACTICE PRINCIPLES.
    Pichon-Riviere A; Soto NC; Augustovski FA; García Martí S; Sampietro-Colom L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 29888696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
    Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Priority setting: what is it all about, and how does it work?].
    Meyer T; Raspe H
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2012 Apr; 51(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 22570153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.
    Wiseman V; Mooney G; Berry G; Tang KC
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 56(5):1001-12. PubMed ID: 12593873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How reforms hamper priority-setting in health care: an interview study with local decision-makers in London.
    Kieslich K; Coultas C; Littlejohns P
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2024 Apr; 19(2):253-268. PubMed ID: 37705170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting.
    Feiring E; Wang H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):342. PubMed ID: 29743065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Should patients with self-inflicted illness receive lower priority in access to healthcare resources? Mapping out the debate.
    Sharkey K; Gillam L
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Nov; 36(11):661-5. PubMed ID: 20817816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Priority setting in health - a political economy perspective.
    Goddard M; Hauck K; Smith PC
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2006 Jan; 1(Pt 1):79-90. PubMed ID: 18634704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Priority-setting and rationing in healthcare: evidence from the English experience.
    Robinson S; Williams I; Dickinson H; Freeman T; Rumbold B
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Dec; 75(12):2386-93. PubMed ID: 23083894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Priority-setting for healthcare: who, how, and is it fair?
    Menon D; Stafinski T; Martin D
    Health Policy; 2007 Dec; 84(2-3):220-33. PubMed ID: 17628202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Process is the point: justice and human rights: priority setting and fair deliberative process.
    Gruskin S; Daniels N
    Am J Public Health; 2008 Sep; 98(9):1573-7. PubMed ID: 18633088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Public engagement in priority-setting: results from a pan-Canadian survey of decision-makers in cancer control.
    Regier DA; Bentley C; Mitton C; Bryan S; Burgess MM; Chesney E; Coldman A; Gibson J; Hoch J; Rahman S; Sabharwal M; Sawka C; Schuckel V; Peacock SJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 122():130-9. PubMed ID: 25441325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The priority-setting platform and its conditions].
    Hermerén G; Sahlin NE
    Lakartidningen; 2019 Nov; 116():. PubMed ID: 31794047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair.
    Ottersen T; Førde R; Kakad M; Kjellevold A; Melberg HO; Moen A; Ringard Å; Norheim OF
    Health Policy; 2016 Mar; 120(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26851991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Priority setting in Austria.
    Stepan A; Sommersguter-Reichmann M
    Health Policy; 1999 Dec; 50(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 10827302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.