209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32334442)
1. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Compared to Cast Co-Cr.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):792-799. PubMed ID: 32334442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fit Alteration of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Multiple-Unit Prostheses After Ceramic Layering.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):789-794. PubMed ID: 33486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal and internal fit of pre-sintered Co-Cr and zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses as measured using microcomputed tomography.
Daou EE; Ounsi H; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 29724558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. X-ray microtomographic evaluation of the absolute marginal fit of fixed prostheses made from soft Co-Cr and zirconia.
Daou EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):289-294. PubMed ID: 33279157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fit accuracy of three-unit fixed ceramic-CoCr dental prostheses fabricated by three different techniques.
Daou EE
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(5):642–649. PubMed ID: 33616570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Cobalt- Chromium Copings Fabricated by Two Different CAD/CAM Systems (CAD/ Milling, CAD/ Ceramill Sintron).
Vojdani M; Torabi K; Atashkar B; Heidari H; Torabi Ardakani M
J Dent (Shiraz); 2016 Dec; 17(4):301-308. PubMed ID: 27942545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of repeated firings on marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different techniques.
Önöral Ö; Ulusoy M; Seker E; Etikan İ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 29627208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of ceramic layering on the fit of cobalt-chromium alloy 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by additive, soft milling, and casting technologies.
Daou EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):130.e1-130.e7. PubMed ID: 34034899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia: Framework versus complete contour design.
Ueda K; Watanabe F; Katsuta Y; Seto M; Ueno D; Hiroyasu K; Suzuki S; Erdelt K; Güth JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):340.e1-340.e6. PubMed ID: 33198991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.
Schönberger J; Erdelt KJ; Bäumer D; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2629-2635. PubMed ID: 28160108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Firing Cycles on the Fit of Cobalt-Chromium Multiunit Prostheses Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 35304798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fitting accuracy of ceramic veneered Co-Cr crowns produced by different manufacturing processes.
Freifrau von Maltzahn N; Bernhard F; Kohorst P
J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 12(2):100-106. PubMed ID: 32377323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
Su TS; Sun J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
