These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32335652)

  • 1. Prevalence of Perforated Graft in Underlay and Pop-in Technique Myringoplasty.
    Pandey BR; Kc P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2019; 57(220):416-419. PubMed ID: 32335652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical and Functional Results of Medial and Lateral Surface of Temporal Muscle Fascia in Type 1 Tympanoplasties.
    Salcan İ
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 May; 100(4):237-240. PubMed ID: 32579383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with double layer graft (modified sandwich fascia) technique and single layer graft (underlay fascia and underlay cartilage) technique.
    Nemade SV; Shinde KJ; Sampate PB
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28855058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel myringoplasty technique: the placement of a complementary graft descending from the scutum to support an anterosuperior perforation.
    Sakalli E; Celikyurt C; Biskin S; Erdurak SC
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 274(1):127-131. PubMed ID: 27515708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Transcanal Composite Chondroperichondrial Tympanoplasty Techniques.
    Gozeler MS; Sahin A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Mar; 100(3):192-195. PubMed ID: 31544506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Underlay myringoplasty: comparison of human amniotic membrane to temporalis fascia graft.
    Harvinder S; Hassan S; Sidek DS; Hamzah M; Samsudin AR; Philip R
    Med J Malaysia; 2005 Dec; 60(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 16515109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of graft uptake by underlay and overlay technique in myringoplasty.
    Khawaja M; Sajid T; Aziz T; Ashfaq U; Khan A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2020; 32(Suppl 1)(4):S640-S643. PubMed ID: 33754523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function.
    Sergi B; Galli J; De Corso E; Parrilla C; Paludetti G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2011 Dec; 31(6):366-71. PubMed ID: 22323847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome of Graft Uptake and Hearing Results between 'U' Flap Technique and Conventional Tympanomeatal Flap Technique for Anterior and Subtotal Tympanic Membrane Perforation.
    Dhungana S; Rayamajhi P; Shrivastav RP
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Oct; 16(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 30455489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty for tympanic perforations: An outpatient minimally invasive procedure.
    Tseng CC; Lai MT; Wu CC; Yuan SP; Ding YF
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):433-439. PubMed ID: 28739189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Mucosal pocket" myringoplasty: a modification of underlay technique for anterior or subtotal perforations.
    Faramarzi A; Hashemi SB; Rajaee A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(6):708-13. PubMed ID: 22901662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative results of simple underlay myringoplasty in better hearing ears.
    Yuasa Y; Yuasa R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Feb; 128(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 17851928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic vs microscopic myringoplasty: a different perspective.
    Lade H; Choudhary SR; Vashishth A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 271(7):1897-902. PubMed ID: 23999592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two myringoplasty techniques in Nepalese children: a prospective randomized trial.
    Tripathi P; Guragain RP; Bhusal CL; Karna SL; Borgstein J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1556-60. PubMed ID: 26231742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studying the result of underlay myringoplasty using platelet-rich plasma.
    Yadav SPS; Malik JS; Malik P; Sehgal PK; Gulia JS; Ranga RK
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Nov; 132(11):990-994. PubMed ID: 30370872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of circumferential subannular tympanoplasty in anterior and subtotal perforations.
    Singh GB; Ranjan S; Arora R; Kumar S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Feb; 131(2):123-127. PubMed ID: 28069080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study.
    Zhang ZG; Huang QH; Zheng YQ; Sun W; Chen YB; Si Y
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1234-8. PubMed ID: 21921853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial cellulose graft versus fat graft in closure of tympanic membrane perforation.
    Mandour YMH; Mohammed S; Menem MOA
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):168-172. PubMed ID: 30594403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Surgical and Audiological Outcomes of Push-Through Myringoplasty and Underlay Cartilage Tympanoplasty in Repairing Anterior Tympanic Membrane Perforations.
    Erden B; Gülşen S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 31(6):1709-1712. PubMed ID: 32310882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Application of fascia of the temporal muscle and cartilage of the auricular tragus in myringoplasty in children].
    Baljošević I; Milanović J; Šubarević V; Novković M; Stanković K
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2012; 140(7-8):408-11. PubMed ID: 23092022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.