303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32336539)
1. Marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated after conventional impression making and digital scanning: An in vitro study.
Carrilho Baltazar Vaz IM; Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):223.e1-223.e6. PubMed ID: 32336539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo.
Bosniac P; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2421-2427. PubMed ID: 30298453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ C.O.S and conventional impression technique.
Dauti R; Cvikl B; Franz A; Schwarze UY; Lilaj B; Rybaczek T; Moritz A
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):129. PubMed ID: 27931256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertical marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated with one direct and three indirect digital scanning techniques.
Akhlaghian M; Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Pardis S
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32868029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material.
Sakornwimon N; Leevailoj C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 28222872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
Su TS; Sun J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal gap of monolithic zirconia endocrowns fabricated by using digital scanning and conventional impressions.
Falahchai M; Babaee Hemmati Y; Neshandar Asli H; Emadi I
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):325.e1-325.e5. PubMed ID: 33190865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods.
Pedroche LO; Bernardes SR; Leão MP; Kintopp CC; Correr GM; Ornaghi BP; Gonzaga CC
Braz Oral Res; 2016 Oct; 30(1):e113. PubMed ID: 27737366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures fabricated from conventional impressions and digital scans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Morsy N; El Kateb M; Azer A; Fathalla S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 34696907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
