These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32337189)

  • 1. Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques.
    I S; C A; H S; P T; T F
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2020 Apr; 10(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 32337189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep learning image reconstruction for quality assessment of iodine concentration in computed tomography: A phantom study.
    Jeon PH; Lee CL
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(2):409-422. PubMed ID: 36744361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT image quality improvement using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT.
    Gervaise A; Osemont B; Lecocq S; Noel A; Micard E; Felblinger J; Blum A
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Feb; 22(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 21927791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm in CT: effect on image quality compared with filtered back projection in body phantoms of different sizes.
    Kim M; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Son H; Choi JW; Han JK; Choi BI
    Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 24644409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.
    Seki S; Koyama H; Ohno Y; Matsumoto S; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 26339037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection.
    Yoo RE; Park EA; Lee W; Shim H; Kim YK; Chung JW; Park JH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 29(3):669-76. PubMed ID: 22923280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients.
    Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between human and model observer performance in low-contrast detection tasks in CT images: application to images reconstructed with filtered back projection and iterative algorithms.
    Hernandez-Giron I; Calzado A; Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 87(1039):20140014. PubMed ID: 24837275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of low-contrast detectability between uniform and anatomically realistic phantoms-influences on CT image quality assessment.
    Conzelmann J; Genske U; Emig A; Scheel M; Hamm B; Jahnke P
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 34476563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study.
    Thompson JD; Chakraborty DP; Szczepura K; Tootell AK; Vamvakas I; Manning DJ; Hogg P
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1265-74. PubMed ID: 26936711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
    Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
    Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D algorithm on the detectability of low-contrast lesions and radiation dose repeatability in abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Hur BY; Baek J; Shim H; Han JK; Choi BI
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1843-52. PubMed ID: 25526686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibration of coronary calcium scores determined using iterative image reconstruction (AIDR 3D) at 120, 100, and 80 kVp.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Goatman KA; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1921. PubMed ID: 27036588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of radiation dose reduction using AIDR-3D in dynamic pulmonary CT perfusion.
    Mirsadraee S; Weir NW; Connolly S; Murchison JT; Reid JH; Hirani N; Connell M; van Beek EJ
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Aug; 70(8):844-51. PubMed ID: 26005001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.