253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32338323)
1. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts.
Kim SH; Kim HH; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 31920025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration of Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound among Women with Negative Mammographic Screening Findings: A Multi-center Population-based Study in China.
Ren W; Yan H; Zhao X; Jia M; Zhang S; Zhang J; Li Z; Ming L; Zhang Y; Li H; He L; Li X; Cheng X; Yue L; Zhou W; Qiao Y; Zhao F
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S114-S126. PubMed ID: 37003874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Performance of Adjunctive Imaging Modalities Compared to Mammography Alone in Women with Non-Dense and Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hadadi I; Rae W; Clarke J; McEntee M; Ekpo E
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):278-291. PubMed ID: 33846098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of the Two-View Scan Technique in Women with Small Breasts.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim SY; Lee SM; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31920026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Performance Using Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer in Chinese Women Aged 40 Years or Older: A Comparative Study.
Zhang L; Bao LY; Tan YJ; Zhu LQ; Xu XJ; Zhu QQ; Shan YN; Zhao J; Xie LS; Liu J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3137-3144. PubMed ID: 31563481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Versus Handheld Breast Ultrasound for Evaluating Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Shin SU; Rim J; Kang E; Kim EK; Shin HC; Park SY; Kim B
Korean J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 25(2):146-156. PubMed ID: 38238017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Potential of Adding Mammography to Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS Ultrasound Category 4a: A Multicenter Hospital-Based Study in China.
Ren W; Zhao X; Zhao X; Yan H; Hu S; Qiao Y; Xu Z; Zhao F
Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3301-3314. PubMed ID: 36975464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: Technical aspects and first results.
Vourtsis A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):579-592. PubMed ID: 30962169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts.
Drukker K; Horsch KJ; Pesce LL; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 23601952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
