308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32339186)
1. Comparing agronomic and phenotypic plant characteristics between single and stacked events in soybean, maize, and cotton.
Jose M; Vertuan H; Soares D; Sordi D; Bellini LF; Kotsubo R; Berger GU
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231733. PubMed ID: 32339186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetically modified crops do not present variations in pollen viability and morphology when compared to their conventional counterparts.
Soares D; Vertuan H; Bacalhau F; José M; Crivellari A; Belchior GG; Berger GU
PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285079. PubMed ID: 37126533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-Event Transgene Product Levels Predict Levels in Genetically Modified Breeding Stacks.
Gampala SS; Fast BJ; Richey KA; Gao Z; Hill R; Wulfkuhle B; Shan G; Bradfisch GA; Herman RA
J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Sep; 65(36):7885-7892. PubMed ID: 28825812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolution of risk assessment strategies for food and feed uses of stacked GM events.
Kramer C; Brune P; McDonald J; Nesbitt M; Sauve A; Storck-Weyhermueller S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2016 Sep; 14(9):1899-913. PubMed ID: 26914314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in global approvals of biotech crops (1992-2014).
Aldemita RR; Reaño IM; Solis RO; Hautea RA
GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(3):150-66. PubMed ID: 26039675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stacked Genetically Engineered Trait Products Produced by Conventional Breeding Reflect the Compositional Profiles of Their Component Single Trait Products.
Bell E; Nakai S; Burzio LA
J Agric Food Chem; 2018 Jul; 66(29):7794-7804. PubMed ID: 29953223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transgene-product expression levels in genetically engineered breeding stacks are equivalent to those of the single events.
De Cerqueira DT; Fast BJ; Silveira AC; Herman RA
GM Crops Food; 2019; 10(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 31010358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consideration of familiarity accumulated in the confined field trials for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified soybean (Glycine max) in Japan.
Matsushita A; Goto H; Takahashi Y; Tsuda M; Ohsawa R
Transgenic Res; 2020 Apr; 29(2):229-242. PubMed ID: 31997144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Romanian experience and perspective on the commercial cultivation of genetically modified crops in Europe.
Ichim MC
Transgenic Res; 2019 Feb; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30238377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transgenic maize event TC1507: Global status of food, feed, and environmental safety.
Baktavachalam GB; Delaney B; Fisher TL; Ladics GS; Layton RJ; Locke ME; Schmidt J; Anderson JA; Weber NN; Herman RA; Evans SL
GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(2):80-102. PubMed ID: 26018138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the use of untargeted metabolomics in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops.
Bedair M; Glenn KC
Metabolomics; 2020 Oct; 16(10):111. PubMed ID: 33037482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Plants with genetically modified events combined by conventional breeding: an assessment of the need for additional regulatory data.
Pilacinski W; Crawford A; Downey R; Harvey B; Huber S; Hunst P; Lahman LK; MacIntosh S; Pohl M; Rickard C; Tagliani L; Weber N
Food Chem Toxicol; 2011 Jan; 49(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21074592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetically modified crops: Brazilian law and overview.
Marinho CD; Martins FJ; Amaral Júnior AT; Gonçalves LS; dos Santos OJ; Alves DP; Brasileiro BP; Peternelli LA
Genet Mol Res; 2014 Jul; 13(3):5221-40. PubMed ID: 25061747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Field trial of insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for environmental risk assessment in Japan.
Asanuma Y; Gondo T; Ishigaki G; Inoue K; Zaita N; Muguerza M; Akashi R
GM Crops Food; 2017 Apr; 8(2):106-116. PubMed ID: 28510512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plant characterization of genetically modified maize hybrids MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3, MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6, and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6: alternatives for maize production in Mexico.
Heredia Díaz O; Aldaba Meza JL; Baltazar BM; Bojórquez Bojórquez G; Castro Espinoza L; Corrales Madrid JL; de la Fuente Martínez JM; Durán Pompa HA; Alonso Escobedo J; Espinoza Banda A; Garzón Tiznado JA; González García J; Guzmán Rodríguez JL; Madueño Martínez JI; Martínez Carrillo JL; Meng C; Quiñones Pando FJ; Rosales Robles E; Ruiz Hernández I; Treviño Ramírez JE; Uribe Montes HR; Zavala García F
Transgenic Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):135-151. PubMed ID: 27771867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trait stacking in transgenic crops: challenges and opportunities.
Que Q; Chilton MD; de Fontes CM; He C; Nuccio M; Zhu T; Wu Y; Chen JS; Shi L
GM Crops; 2010; 1(4):220-9. PubMed ID: 21844677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transportable data from non-target arthropod field studies for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA.
Ahmad A; Negri I; Oliveira W; Brown C; Asiimwe P; Sammons B; Horak M; Jiang C; Carson D
Transgenic Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 26433587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in pesticide use on soybean, corn and cotton since the introduction of major genetically modified crops in the United States.
Coupe RH; Capel PD
Pest Manag Sci; 2016 May; 72(5):1013-22. PubMed ID: 26194175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Successes and insights of an industry biotech program to enhance maize agronomic traits.
Simmons CR; Lafitte HR; Reimann KS; Brugière N; Roesler K; Albertsen MC; Greene TW; Habben JE
Plant Sci; 2021 Jun; 307():110899. PubMed ID: 33902858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
