158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32339484)
1. Difficult etonogestrel implant removals in South Africa: A review of 74 referred cases.
Petro G; Spence T; Patel M; Gertz AM; Morroni C
Contraception; 2020 Aug; 102(2):129-132. PubMed ID: 32339484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of a Nonpalpable Etonogestrel Implant With Preprocedure Ultrasonography and Modified Vasectomy Clamp.
Chen MJ; Creinin MD
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 126(5):935-938. PubMed ID: 26444124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. US referral center experience removing nonpalpable and difficult contraceptive implants with in-office ultrasonography: A case series.
Mastey N; Matulich MC; Uhm S; Baker CC; Melo J; Chen MJ; Creinin MD
Contraception; 2021 Jun; 103(6):428-430. PubMed ID: 33571492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Migration of etonogestrel contraceptive implants: Implications for difficult removals services need in southern Africa.
Petro GA; Spence T; Du Plessis JP; Gertz AM; Morroni C
S Afr Med J; 2019 Jul; 109(8):559-561. PubMed ID: 31456548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of nonpalpable etonogestrel implants after fixation with a curved needle-A case series
El-Hadad S; Villars P; Kahr MK; Leeners B
Contraception; 2021 Nov; 104(5):577-580. PubMed ID: 34245721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Localization and removal of nonpalpable contraceptive implants: Experience from a teaching hospital in Ethiopia: A case series.
Abubeker FA; Tufa TH; Tolu LB; Sium AF; Grentzer JM; Welderufael MB; Prager S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 164(3):1125-1131. PubMed ID: 37787448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Difficult removal of subdermal contraceptive implants: a multidisciplinary approach involving a peripheral nerve expert.
Odom EB; Eisenberg DL; Fox IK
Contraception; 2017 Aug; 96(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 28583591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Referral Center Experience With Nonpalpable Contraceptive Implant Removals.
Matulich MC; Chen MJ; Schimmoeller NR; Hsia JK; Uhm S; Wilson MD; Creinin MD
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 134(4):801-806. PubMed ID: 31503148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removal of etonogestrel contraceptive implants in the operating theater: report on 28 cases.
Vidin E; Garbin O; Rodriguez B; Favre R; Bettahar-Lebugle K
Contraception; 2007 Jul; 76(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 17586134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The US etonogestrel implant mandatory clinical training and active monitoring programs: 6-year experience.
Creinin MD; Kaunitz AM; Darney PD; Schwartz L; Hampton T; Gordon K; Rekers H
Contraception; 2017 Feb; 95(2):205-210. PubMed ID: 27452317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Difficult implant removals.
Voedisch A; Hugin M
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 29(6):449-457. PubMed ID: 28938375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Closing the Gap: Ensuring Access to and Quality of Contraceptive Implant Removal Services is Essential to Rights-based Contraceptive Care.
Howett R; Gertz AM; Kgaswanyane T; Petro G; Mokganya L; Malima S; Maotwe T; Pleaner M; Morroni C
Afr J Reprod Health; 2019 Dec; 23(4):19-26. PubMed ID: 32227736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Case Report: Traumatic Incomplete Fracture of an Implanon NXT® Contraceptive Implant.
Howett R; Gertz AM; Kgaswanyane T; Petro G; Morroni C
Afr J Reprod Health; 2019 Dec; 23(4):124-128. PubMed ID: 32227747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early removal of etonogestrel subcutaneous contraceptive implant at a community health centre in Pretoria.
Moeti DMP; Govender I; Bongongo T
S Afr Fam Pract (2004); 2022 Jul; 64(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 35924618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hormone-releasing contraceptive implants: our experience of complex removals using preoperative ultrasound.
Vollans SR; Grainger A; O'Connor P; Limb D
Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 25889152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonpalpable implant removals at centre of experience in France: a cohort study.
Chene G; Akl P; Gjorgjievska-Delov A; Cerruto E; Moret S; Nohuz E
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2024 May; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38813779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate versus delayed insertion of an etonogestrel releasing implant at medical abortion-a randomized controlled equivalence trial.
Hognert H; Kopp Kallner H; Cameron S; Nyrelli C; Jawad I; Heller R; Aronsson A; Lindh I; Benson L; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2484-2490. PubMed ID: 27664217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with removal difficulties of etonogestrel-containing contraceptive implants (Nexplanon
Chevreau J; Krief D; Abou Arab O; Zitoun M; Foulon A; Sergent F; Gondry J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 May; 224():81-84. PubMed ID: 29554605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasons for requesting removal of the hormonal implant, Implanon NXT, at an urban reproductive health clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Beesham I; Smit J; Beksinska M; Panday M; Makatini V; Evans S
S Afr Med J; 2019 Sep; 109(10):750-755. PubMed ID: 31635572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
