144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32340876)
1. External validation and comparison of the original, alternative and updated-alternative fistula risk scores for the prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Shinde RS; Acharya R; Chaudhari VA; Bhandare MS; Mungroop TH; Klompmaker S; Besselink MG; Shrikhande SV
Pancreatology; 2020 Jun; 20(4):751-756. PubMed ID: 32340876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three fistula risk scores after pancreatoduodenectomy: A single-institution retrospective study.
Hayashi H; Amaya K; Fujiwara Y; Tokai R; Sugimoto Y; Hashimoto Y; Nakura M; Kawai S; Yamaguchi T; Hirose A; Watanabe T; Tsukada T; Kaji M; Maeda K; Shimizu K
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):143-146. PubMed ID: 32409242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Independent external validation and comparison of existing pancreatic fistula risk scores after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with Bing's pancreaticojejunostomy.
You J; Fu Y; Cai H; Wang X; Li Y; Zhang M; Tang J; Gao P; Cai Y; Peng B
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Apr; 28(4):474-482. PubMed ID: 38583898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of original, alternative, and updated alternative fistula risk scores after open and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy in an Asian patient cohort.
Lee B; Yoon YS; Kang CM; Choi M; Lee JS; Hwang HK; Cho JY; Lee WJ; Han HS
Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):1822-1829. PubMed ID: 36229557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to Include Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Pan-European Validation.
Mungroop TH; Klompmaker S; Wellner UF; Steyerberg EW; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; de Pastena M; Dokmak S; Khatkov I; Saint-Marc O; Wittel U; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2021 Feb; 273(2):334-340. PubMed ID: 30829699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomography-adjusted fistula risk score for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: Training and external validation of model upgrade.
Shi Y; Gao F; Qi Y; Lu H; Ai F; Hou Y; Liu C; Xu Y; Zhang X; Cai X
EBioMedicine; 2020 Dec; 62():103096. PubMed ID: 33161232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of alternative fistula risk score (a-FRS) for predicting pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Lao M; Zhang X; Guo C; Chen W; Zhang Q; Ma T; Bai X; Liang T
HPB (Oxford); 2020 Jan; 22(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 31272847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of original and alternative fistula risk scores in postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Ryu Y; Shin SH; Park DJ; Kim N; Heo JS; Choi DW; Han IW
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2019 Aug; 26(8):354-359. PubMed ID: 31125494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative adiposity at bioimpedance vector analysis improves the ability of Fistula Risk Score (FRS) in predicting pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Angrisani M; Sandini M; Cereda M; Paiella S; Capretti G; Nappo G; Roccamatisi L; Casciani F; Caccialanza R; Bassi C; Zerbi A; Gianotti L
Pancreatology; 2020 Apr; 20(3):545-550. PubMed ID: 31980350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is a better predictor of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): postoperative day one drain amylase (POD1DA) or the fistula risk score (FRS)?
Bertens KA; Crown A; Clanton J; Alemi F; Alseidi AA; Biehl T; Helton WS; Rocha FG
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Jan; 19(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 27825541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative Fistula Risk Score for Pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): Design and International External Validation.
Mungroop TH; van Rijssen LB; van Klaveren D; Smits FJ; van Woerden V; Linnemann RJ; de Pastena M; Klompmaker S; Marchegiani G; Ecker BL; van Dieren S; Bonsing B; Busch OR; van Dam RM; Erdmann J; van Eijck CH; Gerhards MF; van Goor H; van der Harst E; de Hingh IH; de Jong KP; Kazemier G; Luyer M; Shamali A; Barbaro S; Armstrong T; Takhar A; Hamady Z; Klaase J; Lips DJ; Molenaar IQ; Nieuwenhuijs VB; Rupert C; van Santvoort HC; Scheepers JJ; van der Schelling GP; Bassi C; Vollmer CM; Steyerberg EW; Abu Hilal M; Groot Koerkamp B; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):937-943. PubMed ID: 29240007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of risk adjusted excess post-operative pancreatic fistula rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy using cumulative sum analysis.
Lockie EB; Knowles B; Gill PK; Thomson B; Loveday BPT
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Jul; 92(7-8):1784-1788. PubMed ID: 35579055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort.
Schouten TJ; Henry AC; Smits FJ; Besselink MG; Bonsing BA; Bosscha K; Busch OR; van Dam RM; van Eijck CH; Festen S; Groot Koerkamp B; van der Harst E; de Hingh IHJT; Kazemier G; Liem MSL; de Meijer VE; Patijn GA; Roos D; Schreinemakers JMJ; Stommel MWJ; Wit F; Daamen LA; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC;
Ann Surg; 2023 Dec; 278(6):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 36804843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A modified alternative fistula risk score (a-FRS) obtained from the computed tomography enhancement pattern of the pancreatic parenchyma predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Tang B; Lin Z; Ma Y; Zhang A; Liu W; Zhang J; Wang X; Tian X; Yang Y
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Nov; 23(11):1759-1766. PubMed ID: 33975799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical validation of the risk scoring systems of postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in Chinese cohorts: A single-center retrospective study.
Niu C; Chen Q; Liu S; Zhang W; Jiang P; Liu Y
Surgery; 2022 Apr; 171(4):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 34511238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy.
Miller BC; Christein JD; Behrman SW; Drebin JA; Pratt WB; Callery MP; Vollmer CM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Jan; 18(1):172-79; discussion 179-80. PubMed ID: 24002771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Use of alternative pancreatic fistula risk score system for patients with clinical relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy].
Niu CY; Ji B; Dai XL; Guan QC; Liu YH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 59(7):631-635. PubMed ID: 34256465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of factors influencing pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and establishment of a new prediction model for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.
Zhu Y; Wu D; Yang H; Lu Z; Wang Z; Zu G; Li Z; Xu X; Zhang Y; Chen X; Chen W
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2622-2631. PubMed ID: 38499780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visceral adipose tissue is a better predictor than BMI in the alternative Fistula Risk Score in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.
Lucassen CJ; Groen JV; Aziz MH; Bastiaannet E; Bonsing BA; Leistra E; Shahbazi Feshtali S; Vahrmeijer AL; Droop A; Mieog JSD
HPB (Oxford); 2022 Oct; 24(10):1679-1687. PubMed ID: 35527105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External validation of four Pancreatic Fistula Risk Score models in the Deep South US: Do racial disparities affect pancreatic fistula prediction?
Blunck CK; Vickers SM; Wang TN; Dudeja V; Reddy S; Rose JB
Am J Surg; 2022 Jul; 224(1 Pt B):557-561. PubMed ID: 35219491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
