113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32340911)
1. The effect of added fat on the accuracy of Cobb angle measurements in CT SPR images: A phantom study.
Alrehily F; Alanezi A; Alsady G; Benqlilou M; Carlos L; Smit C; Snetler L; Coward J
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S88-S93. PubMed ID: 32340911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of Cobb angle measurement on CT scan projection radiograph images.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e73-e77. PubMed ID: 32052770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of a bespoke phantom to test accuracy of Cobb angle measurements.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e78-e87. PubMed ID: 32052769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Changhai fulcrum bending radiographic technique to assess curve flexibility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis].
Wang F; Li J; Chen Z; Wu H; Li B; He X; Wei X; Yi H; Wang C; Bai Y; Zhu X; Li M
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 52(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 25034743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Predictive Model of Progression for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Based on 3D Spine Parameters at First Visit.
Nault ML; Beauséjour M; Roy-Beaudry M; Mac-Thiong JM; de Guise J; Labelle H; Parent S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):605-611. PubMed ID: 31703055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scoliosis imaging: An analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 31301794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before operation].
Fei Q; Wang YP; Qiu GX; Zhao Y; Shen JX; Zhang JG; Zhao LJ; Yin RF; Wang NG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 87(35):2484-8. PubMed ID: 18067811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of an artificial intelligence-based method to automate Cobb angle measurement on spinal radiographs of children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Wong JC; Reformat MZ; Parent EC; Stampe KP; Southon Hryniuk SC; Lou EH
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2023 Aug; 59(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 37746786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy on the preoperative assessment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using biplanar low-dose stereoradiography: a comparison with computed tomography.
Yeung KH; Man GCW; Lam TP; Ng BKW; Cheng JCY; Chu WCW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):558. PubMed ID: 32811481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis perceive positive improvements regardless of change in the Cobb angle - Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month Schroth intervention added to standard care and standard care alone. SOSORT 2018 Award winner.
Schreiber S; Parent EC; Hill DL; Hedden DM; Moreau MJ; Southon SC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jul; 20(1):319. PubMed ID: 31286903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of disc and vertebral wedging between patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis.
Wang S; Qiu Y; Ma W; Wang B; Yu Y; Qian B; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Sun X
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 21617568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between Cobb angle, spinous process angle (SPA) and apical vertebrae rotation (AVR) on posteroanterior radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Morrison DG; Chan A; Hill D; Parent EC; Lou EH
Eur Spine J; 2015 Feb; 24(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 25412836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated comprehensive Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis assessment using MVC-Net.
Wu H; Bailey C; Rasoulinejad P; Li S
Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():1-11. PubMed ID: 29803920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is radiation-free diagnostic monitoring of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis feasible using upright positional magnetic resonance imaging?
Diefenbach C; Lonner BS; Auerbach JD; Bharucha N; Dean LE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):576-80. PubMed ID: 23324938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accurate prediction of height loss in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Cobb angle alone is insufficient.
Shi B; Mao S; Xu L; Sun X; Liu Z; Cheng JC; Zhu Z; Qiu Y
Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3341-3346. PubMed ID: 27001137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method.
Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E
Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive scoliosis surgery assisted by O-arm navigation for Lenke Type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison with standard open approach spinal instrumentation.
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Apr; 19(4):472-478. PubMed ID: 28186473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
