These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32341605)

  • 1. Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.
    Ma W
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):167-181. PubMed ID: 32341605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.
    de Oliveira ESB; Wang X; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2100222. PubMed ID: 36782079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
    Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.
    Wang C; Shu Z; Shang Z; Xu G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 39(7):525-538. PubMed ID: 29881024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.
    Ma W; Iaconangelo C; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):200-217. PubMed ID: 29881048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.
    Yigit HD; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jul; 43(5):388-401. PubMed ID: 31235984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.
    Hong H; Wang C; Lim YS; Douglas J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 29880992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying the
    Chen F; Liu Y; Xin T; Cui Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1875. PubMed ID: 30356781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the Sequential Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnostic Model.
    Zhang X; Wang J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579018. PubMed ID: 33117245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnosis Model with Ordinal Attributes for Dichotomous Response Data.
    Ma W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):408-421. PubMed ID: 33434081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Sequential Process Model for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment With Repeated Attempts.
    Hung SP; Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):495-511. PubMed ID: 31534286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First-Order Learning Models With the GDINA: Estimation With the EM Algorithm and Applications.
    Yigit HD; Douglas JA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 May; 45(3):143-158. PubMed ID: 33958833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introducing the General Polytomous Diagnosis Modeling Framework.
    Chen J; de la Torre J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1474. PubMed ID: 30186195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multilevel Modeling of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: The Multilevel DINA Example.
    Wang WC; Qiu XL
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 30573933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian DINA Modeling Incorporating Within-Item Characteristic Dependency.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao M; Bian Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):143-158. PubMed ID: 30792561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferential Item-Fit Evaluation in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.
    Sorrel MA; Abad FJ; Olea J; de la Torre J; Barrada JR
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Nov; 41(8):614-631. PubMed ID: 29882533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.