BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32341608)

  • 1. Approximating Bifactor IRT True-Score Equating With a Projective Item Response Model.
    Kim KY; Cho UH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):215-218. PubMed ID: 32341608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item Response Theory True Score Equating for the Bifactor Model Under the Common-Item Nonequivalent Groups Design.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):479-493. PubMed ID: 35991829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robustness of Projective IRT to Misspecification of the Underlying Multidimensional Model.
    Strachan T; Ip E; Fu Y; Ackerman T; Chen SH; Willse J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jul; 44(5):362-375. PubMed ID: 32879536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple-Structure Multidimensional Item Response Theory Equating for Multidimensional Tests.
    Kim SY; Lee WC; Kolen MJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Feb; 80(1):91-125. PubMed ID: 31933494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of IRT Observed Score Kernel Equating and Several Equating Methods.
    Wang S; Zhang M; You S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():308. PubMed ID: 32210877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating Equating Transformations in IRT Observed-Score and Kernel Equating Methods.
    LeƓncio W; Wiberg M; Battauz M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Mar; 47(2):123-140. PubMed ID: 36875292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency Analysis of Item Response Theory Kernel Equating for Mixed-Format Tests.
    Wallmark J; Josefsson M; Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):496-512. PubMed ID: 38027462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of the Separate and Concurrent Calibration Methods for the Full-Information Bifactor model.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):512-526. PubMed ID: 31534287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability.
    Zhao Y; Chan W; Lo BC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):60. PubMed ID: 28372559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item Response Theory Observed-Score Kernel Equating.
    Andersson B; Wiberg M
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 27743280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.
    Reise SP; Morizot J; Hays RD
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():19-31. PubMed ID: 17479357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A General Bayesian Multidimensional Item Response Theory Model for Small and Large Samples.
    Fujimoto KA; Neugebauer SR
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Aug; 80(4):665-694. PubMed ID: 32616954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disparity between General Symptom Relief and Remission Criteria in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): A Post-treatment Bifactor Item Response Theory Model.
    Anderson AE; Reise SP; Marder SR; Mansolf M; Han C; Bilder RM
    Innov Clin Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 14(11-12):41-53. PubMed ID: 29410936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical Consequences of Item Response Theory Model Misfit in the Context of Test Equating with Mixed-Format Test Data.
    Zhao Y; Hambleton RK
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():484. PubMed ID: 28421011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting Valid and Reliable Overall Scores and Domain Scores Using Bi-Factor Model.
    Liu Y; Li Z; Liu H
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):562-576. PubMed ID: 31534290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of Sampling Variance of Item Response Theory Parameter Estimates in Detecting Outliers in Common Item Equating.
    Liu C; Jurich D
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):529-547. PubMed ID: 35991825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Motivational-Developmental Free Response Assessment Through a Bifactor Lens.
    Alpizar D; French BF
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():770327. PubMed ID: 34925171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Item Selection Methods for Computer Adaptive Testing With Passages.
    Yao L
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():240. PubMed ID: 30890972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative Linear Item Response Theory Observed-Score Equating Methods.
    Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):180-199. PubMed ID: 29881047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Approach to Scoring and Equating Tests With Binary Items: Piloting With Large-Scale Assessments.
    Dimitrov DM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):954-975. PubMed ID: 29795895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.