174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32341684)
1. Toxic Responses Induced at High Doses May Affect Benchmark Doses.
Zarn JA; Zürcher UA; Geiser HC
Dose Response; 2020; 18(2):1559325820919605. PubMed ID: 32341684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the lower limit of benchmark dose confidence interval with no-observed-adverse-effect level by applying four different software for tumorigenicity testing of pesticides in Japan.
Yasuhiko Y; Ishigami M; Machino S; Fujii T; Aoki M; Irie F; Kanda Y; Yoshida M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Aug; 133():105201. PubMed ID: 35691450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmark concentrations for methylmercury obtained from the Seychelles Child Development Study.
Crump KS; Van Landingham C; Shamlaye C; Cox C; Davidson PW; Myers GJ; Clarkson TW
Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Mar; 108(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 10706533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current modeling practice may lead to falsely high benchmark dose estimates.
Ringblom J; Johanson G; Öberg M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Jul; 69(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 24662478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk assessment for Thai population: benchmark dose of urinary and blood cadmium levels for renal effects by hybrid approach of inhabitants living in polluted and non-polluted areas in Thailand.
Nishijo M; Suwazono Y; Ruangyuttikarn W; Nambunmee K; Swaddiwudhipong W; Nogawa K; Nakagawa H
BMC Public Health; 2014 Jul; 14():702. PubMed ID: 25012790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmark Dose for Urinary Cadmium based on a Marker of Renal Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis.
Woo HD; Chiu WA; Jo S; Kim J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126680. PubMed ID: 25970611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.
West RW; Piegorsch WW; Peña EA; An L; Wu W; Wickens AA; Xiong H; Chen W
Environmetrics; 2012 Dec; 23(8):706-716. PubMed ID: 23794799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of benchmark dose methodology for non-cancer continuous-data health effects in animals due to exposures to dioxin (TCDD).
Gaylor DW; Aylward LL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Aug; 40(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15265602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
