These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32341957)

  • 1. Visual encoding of partial unknown shape boundaries.
    Nordberg H; Hautus MJ; Greene E
    AIMS Neurosci; 2018; 5(2):132-147. PubMed ID: 32341957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating persistence of shape information using a matching protocol.
    Greene E; Hautus MJ
    AIMS Neurosci; 2018; 5(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 32341953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Masking the Integration of Complementary Shape Cues.
    Geoly A; Greene E
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():178. PubMed ID: 30918480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition of objects displayed with incomplete sets of discrete boundary dots.
    Greene E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1043-59. PubMed ID: 17879637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition of letters displayed as briefly flashed dot patterns.
    Greene E; Visani A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1955-69. PubMed ID: 25939701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retinal encoding of ultrabrief shape recognition cues.
    Greene E
    PLoS One; 2007 Sep; 2(9):e871. PubMed ID: 17849001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneity in the millisecond range as a requirement for effective shape recognition.
    Greene E
    Behav Brain Funct; 2006 Nov; 2():38. PubMed ID: 17134493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation.
    Pasupathy A; Connor CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2505-19. PubMed ID: 11698538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New encoding concepts for shape recognition are needed.
    Greene E
    AIMS Neurosci; 2018; 5(3):162-178. PubMed ID: 32341959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification of partial 2-d shapes using fourier descriptors.
    Lin CC; Chellappa R
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 1987 May; 9(5):686-90. PubMed ID: 21869427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Additional evidence that contour attributes are not essential cues for object recognition.
    Greene E
    Behav Brain Funct; 2008 Jul; 4():26. PubMed ID: 18593469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceiving Object Shape from Specular Highlight Deformation, Boundary Contour Deformation, and Active Haptic Manipulation.
    Norman JF; Phillips F; Cheeseman JR; Thomason KE; Ronning C; Behari K; Kleinman K; Calloway AB; Lamirande D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149058. PubMed ID: 26863531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information persistence evaluated with low-density dot patterns.
    Greene E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():215-25. PubMed ID: 27614198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual judgment of similarity across shape transformations: evidence for a compositional model of articulated objects.
    Barenholtz E; Tarr MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 18466857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process?
    Vecera SP; Farah MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1280-96. PubMed ID: 9401461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling diverse responses to filled and outline shapes in macaque V4.
    Popovkina DV; Bair W; Pasupathy A
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Mar; 121(3):1059-1077. PubMed ID: 30699004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isolated processing of geometric shapes and their corresponding shape words: Evidence from a delayed match-to-sample task.
    Edwards JE; Boyer TW; Bell ZK; Sturz BR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1088-103. PubMed ID: 26820248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual lobe shape and search performance for targets of different difficulty.
    Chan AH; Tang NY
    Ergonomics; 2007 Feb; 50(2):289-318. PubMed ID: 17419160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object Categorization Processing Differs According to Category Level: Comparing Visual Information Between the Basic and Superordinate Levels.
    Taniguchi K; Kuraguchi K; Takano Y; Itakura S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():501. PubMed ID: 32269541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
    Burchfield T; Greene E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0224530. PubMed ID: 32433696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.