142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32342295)
1. Legacy Genetic Testing Results for Cancer Susceptibility: How Common are Conflicting Classifications in a Large Variant Dataset from Multiple Practices?
Yin K; Liu Y; Lamichhane B; Sandbach JF; Patel G; Compagnoni G; Kanak RH; Rosen B; Ondrula DP; Smith L; Brown E; Gold L; Whitworth P; App C; Euhus D; Semine A; Dwight Lyons S; Lazarte MAC; Parmigiani G; Braun D; Hughes KS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):2212-2220. PubMed ID: 32342295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Variant Classification: A Comparison of Public Databases and a Commercial Testing Laboratory.
Gradishar W; Johnson K; Brown K; Mundt E; Manley S
Oncologist; 2017 Jul; 22(7):797-803. PubMed ID: 28408614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of hereditary cancer gene variant classifications from ClinVar indicates a need for regular reassessment of clinical assertions.
Davidson AL; Kondrashova O; Leonard C; Wood S; Tudini E; Hollway GE; Pearson JV; Newell F; Spurdle AB; Waddell N
Hum Mutat; 2022 Dec; 43(12):2054-2062. PubMed ID: 36095262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sources of discordance among germ-line variant classifications in ClinVar.
Yang S; Lincoln SE; Kobayashi Y; Nykamp K; Nussbaum RL; Topper S
Genet Med; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1118-1126. PubMed ID: 28569743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scaling resolution of variant classification differences in ClinVar between 41 clinical laboratories through an outlier approach.
Harrison SM; Dolinksy JS; Chen W; Collins CD; Das S; Deignan JL; Garber KB; Garcia J; Jarinova O; Knight Johnson AE; Koskenvuo JW; Lee H; Mao R; Mar-Heyming R; McFaddin AS; Moyer K; Nagan N; Rentas S; Santani AB; Seppälä EH; Shirts BH; Tidwell T; Topper S; Vincent LM; Vinette K; Rehm HL;
Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1641-1649. PubMed ID: 30311378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability in gene-based knowledge impacts variant classification: an analysis of FBN1 missense variants in ClinVar.
Baudhuin LM; Kluge ML; Kotzer KE; Lagerstedt SA
Eur J Hum Genet; 2019 Oct; 27(10):1550-1560. PubMed ID: 31227806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conflicting Interpretation of Genetic Variants and Cancer Risk by Commercial Laboratories as Assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing.
Balmaña J; Digiovanni L; Gaddam P; Walsh MF; Joseph V; Stadler ZK; Nathanson KL; Garber JE; Couch FJ; Offit K; Robson ME; Domchek SM
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 34(34):4071-4078. PubMed ID: 27621404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical implications of conflicting variant interpretations in the cancer genetics clinic.
Zukin E; Culver JO; Liu Y; Yang Y; Ricker CN; Hodan R; Sturgeon D; Kingham K; Chun NM; Rowe-Teeter C; Singh K; Zell JA; Ladabaum U; McDonnell KJ; Ford JM; Parmigiani G; Braun D; Kurian AW; Gruber SB; Idos GE
Genet Med; 2023 Jul; 25(7):100837. PubMed ID: 37057674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Data sharing to improve concordance in variant interpretation across laboratories: results from the Canadian Open Genetics Repository.
Mighton C; Smith AC; Mayers J; Tomaszewski R; Taylor S; Hume S; Agatep R; Spriggs E; Feilotter HE; Semenuk L; Wong H; Lazo de la Vega L; Marshall CR; Axford MM; Silver T; Charames GS; Di Gioacchino V; Watkins N; Foulkes WD; Clavier M; Hamel N; Chong G; Lamont RE; Parboosingh J; Karsan A; Bosdet I; Young SS; Tucker T; Akbari MR; Speevak MD; Vaags AK; Lebo MS; Lerner-Ellis J;
J Med Genet; 2022 Jun; 59(6):571-578. PubMed ID: 33875564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical variants paired with phenotype: A rich resource for brain gene curation.
Chopra M; Savatt JM; Bingaman TI; Good ME; Morgan A; Cooney C; Rossel AM; VanHoute B; Cordova I; Mahida S; Lanzotti V; Baldridge D; Gurnett CA; Piven J; Hazlett H; Pomeroy SL; Sahin M; Payne PRO; Riggs ER; Constantino JN;
Genet Med; 2024 Mar; 26(3):101035. PubMed ID: 38059438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consistency of
Lincoln SE; Yang S; Cline MS; Kobayashi Y; Zhang C; Topper S; Haussler D; Paten B; Nussbaum RL
JCO Precis Oncol; 2017 Jul; 1():. PubMed ID: 28782058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reinterpretation of common pathogenic variants in ClinVar revealed a high proportion of downgrades.
Xiang J; Yang J; Chen L; Chen Q; Yang H; Sun C; Zhou Q; Peng Z
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):331. PubMed ID: 31942019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinically impactful differences in variant interpretation between clinicians and testing laboratories: a single-center experience.
Bland A; Harrington EA; Dunn K; Pariani M; Platt JCK; Grove ME; Caleshu C
Genet Med; 2018 Mar; 20(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 29240077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Frequency of Discordant Variant Classification in the Human Gene Mutation Database: A Comparison of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Guidelines and ClinVar.
Park KJ; Lee W; Chun S; Min WK
Lab Med; 2021 May; 52(3):250-259. PubMed ID: 32926152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ClinVar and HGMD genomic variant classification accuracy has improved over time, as measured by implied disease burden.
Sharo AG; Zou Y; Adhikari AN; Brenner SE
Genome Med; 2023 Jul; 15(1):51. PubMed ID: 37443081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Informing variant assessment using structured evidence from prior classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 sequence variant interpretation criteria).
Bhat V; Adzhubei IA; Fife JD; Lebo M; Cassa CA
Genet Med; 2023 Jan; 25(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 36305854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.
Amendola LM; Muenzen K; Biesecker LG; Bowling KM; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Driscoll C; Foreman AKM; Golden-Grant K; Greally JM; Hindorff L; Kanavy D; Jobanputra V; Johnston JJ; Kenny EE; McNulty S; Murali P; Ou J; Powell BC; Rehm HL; Rolf B; Roman TS; Van Ziffle J; Guha S; Abhyankar A; Crosslin D; Venner E; Yuan B; Zouk H; ; Jarvik GP
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33108757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Somatic and Germline Variant Interpretation in Hereditary Cancer Genes.
Moody EW; Vagher J; Espinel W; Goldgar D; Hagerty KJ; Gammon A
JCO Precis Oncol; 2019 Dec; 3():1-8. PubMed ID: 35100725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic variants with discordant classifications: An assessment of genetic counselor attitudes and practices.
Lahiri S; Reys B; Wunder J; Pirzadeh-Miller S
J Genet Couns; 2023 Feb; 32(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 35978490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-lab concordance of variant classifications establishes clinical validity of expanded carrier screening.
Kaseniit KE; Collins E; Lo C; Moyer K; Mar-Heyming R; Kang HP; Muzzey D
Clin Genet; 2019 Sep; 96(3):236-245. PubMed ID: 31170325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
