These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32342344)

  • 1. Sensation weighting in duration discrimination: A univariate, multivariate, and varied-design study of presentation-order effects.
    Hellström Å; Patching GR; Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):3196-3220. PubMed ID: 32342344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-order errors and standard-position effects in duration discrimination: An experimental study and an analysis by the sensation-weighting model.
    Hellström Å; Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2409-23. PubMed ID: 26082151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of time-order, interstimulus interval, and feedback in duration discrimination of noise bursts in the 50- and 1000-ms ranges.
    Hellström A; Rammsayer TH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15111227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intramodal and crossmodal pairing and anchoring in comparisons of successive stimuli.
    Hellström Å; Cederström C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1197-211. PubMed ID: 24604542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensation weighting in comparison and discrimination of heaviness.
    Hellström A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Feb; 26(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 10696602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Presentation-order effects for aesthetic stimulus preference.
    Englund MP; Hellström Å
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1499-511. PubMed ID: 22760928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference.
    Hellström A
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1161-77. PubMed ID: 14674641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination sensitivity for short and long durations.
    Bausenhart KM; Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1033-43. PubMed ID: 25832187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time errors and differential sensation weighting.
    Hellström A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):460-77. PubMed ID: 528952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Duration discrimination: A diffusion decision modeling approach.
    Schumacher L; Voss A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):560-577. PubMed ID: 36690915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: data and models.
    Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1121-50. PubMed ID: 24295428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.
    Lapid E; Ulrich R; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 18372750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decay of internal reference information in duration discrimination: Intertrial interval modulates the Type B effect.
    Ellinghaus R; Gick M; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1578-1586. PubMed ID: 30282525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities.
    Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time-Order Errors in Duration Judgment Are Independent of Spatial Positioning.
    Harrison C; Binetti N; Mareschal I; Johnston A
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():340. PubMed ID: 28337162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Order effects in stimulus discrimination challenge established models of comparative judgement: A meta-analytic review of the Type B effect.
    Ellinghaus R; Bausenhart KM; Koc D; Ulrich R; Liepelt R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beware how you compare: comparison direction dictates stimulus-valence-modulated presentation-order effects in preference judgment.
    Englund MP; Hellström Å
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 23592182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two attentive strategies reducing subjective distortions in serial duration perception.
    Sierra F; Poeppel D; Tavano A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0265415. PubMed ID: 35298528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The intensity-difference limen for Gaussian-enveloped stimuli as a function of level: tones and broadband noise.
    Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2505-15. PubMed ID: 11757940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative judgments affect assessments of stimulus duration.
    Molet M; Zentall TR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 18488664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.