286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32342442)
1. Vulnerability in human research.
Pieper IJ; Thomson CJH
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 May; 38(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 32342442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.
Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J;
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Vulnerability in research ethics: a way forward.
Lange MM; Rogers W; Dodds S
Bioethics; 2013 Jul; 27(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 23718774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members.
Hokke S; Hackworth NJ; Bennetts SK; Nicholson JM; Keyzer P; Lucke J; Zion L; Crawford SB
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020; 15(1-2):12-27. PubMed ID: 31195884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CIOMS guidelines remain conservative about vulnerability and social justice.
Ho CW
Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 28661402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide.
Pieper IJ; Thomson CJ
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2014; 32(3-4):232-53. PubMed ID: 25743049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent, vulnerability and the risks of group-specific attribution.
Schrems BM
Nurs Ethics; 2014 Nov; 21(7):829-43. PubMed ID: 24493709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):19-36. PubMed ID: 20945264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protocols for protection of human participants: a comparison of five countries.
Clough BA; Campbell MM; Aliyeva TA; Mateo NJ; Zarean M; O'Donovan A
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Jul; 8(3):2-11. PubMed ID: 23933771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical considerations of research in disaster-stricken populations.
Jesus JE; Michael GE
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2009; 24(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 19591303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical issues raised by cluster randomised trials conducted in low-resource settings: identifying gaps in the
Mtande TK; Weijer C; Hosseinipour MC; Taljaard M; Matoga M; Goldstein CE; Nyambalo B; Rosenberg NE
J Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 45(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 31189724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
Jaitovich Groisman I; Egalite N; Godard B
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():80. PubMed ID: 25410958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. IRBs: protecting the well-being of subject-participants with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
Baylis F
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):183-99. PubMed ID: 11658175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
