These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32342703)

  • 1. Remote Management of Pacemaker Patients With Biennial In-Clinic Evaluation: Continuous Home Monitoring in the Japanese At-Home Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Watanabe E; Yamazaki F; Goto T; Asai T; Yamamoto T; Hirooka K; Sato T; Kasai A; Ueda M; Yamakawa T; Ueda Y; Yamamoto K; Tokunaga T; Sugai Y; Tanaka K; Hiramatsu S; Arakawa T; Schrader J; Varma N; Ando K
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 May; 13(5):e007734. PubMed ID: 32342703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness and safety of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable loop recorder.
    Drak-Hernández Y; Toquero-Ramos J; Fernández JM; Pérez-Pereira E; Castro-Urda V; Fernández-Lozano I
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2013 Dec; 66(12):943-8. PubMed ID: 24774107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of arrhythmic events is useful to detect lead failure earlier in patients followed by remote monitoring.
    Nishii N; Miyoshi A; Kubo M; Miyamoto M; Morimoto Y; Kawada S; Nakagawa K; Watanabe A; Nakamura K; Morita H; Ito H
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):463-470. PubMed ID: 29194831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active periodic electrograms in remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients: the PREMS study.
    Lazarus A; Guy-Moyat B; Mondoly P; Pons F; Quaglia C; Elkaim JP; Bayle S; Victor F
    Europace; 2019 Jan; 21(1):130-136. PubMed ID: 29955890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices after stroke or transient ischemic attack.
    De Simone V; Zanotto G; Guarise P; Venturato A; Cassinadri E; Bassi M; Bozzolin M; Tondelli S; Giacopelli D; Morando G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2019 Aug; 20(8):551-556. PubMed ID: 31157660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead and generator performance: the Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) trial.
    Varma N; Michalski J; Epstein AE; Schweikert R
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2010 Oct; 3(5):428-36. PubMed ID: 20716717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry.
    Ricci RP; Morichelli L; D'Onofrio A; Calò L; Vaccari D; Zanotto G; Curnis A; Buja G; Rovai N; Gargaro A
    Europace; 2013 Jul; 15(7):970-7. PubMed ID: 23362021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Remote Heart Rhythm Sampling Using the AliveCor Heart Monitor to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: The REHEARSE-AF Study.
    Halcox JPJ; Wareham K; Cardew A; Gilmore M; Barry JP; Phillips C; Gravenor MB
    Circulation; 2017 Nov; 136(19):1784-1794. PubMed ID: 28851729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers.
    Crossley GH; Chen J; Choucair W; Cohen TJ; Gohn DC; Johnson WB; Kennedy EE; Mongeon LR; Serwer GA; Qiao H; Wilkoff BL;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):2012-9. PubMed ID: 19926006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of specialized and automated features in implantable cardiac devices.
    Ayinde H; Lloyd M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):271-285. PubMed ID: 31724786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential role of remote monitoring for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator.
    Heidbüchel H; Lioen P; Foulon S; Huybrechts W; Ector J; Willems R; Ector H
    Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18245771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quarterly vs. yearly clinical follow-up of remotely monitored recipients of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the REFORM trial.
    Hindricks G; Elsner C; Piorkowski C; Taborsky M; Geller JC; Schumacher B; Bytesnik J; Kottkamp H
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Jan; 35(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 23868932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and compatibility of smart device heart rhythm monitoring in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.
    Abudan AA; Isath A; Ryan JD; Henrich MJ; Dugan JL; Attia ZI; Ladewig DJ; Dillon JJ; Friedman PA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1602-1609. PubMed ID: 31190453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remote monitoring of implantable pacemakers: in-office setup significantly improves successful data transmission.
    Ren X; Apostolakos C; Vo TH; Shaw RE; Shields K; Banki NM; Zuckermann DW; Flint AC; Hongo RH; Goldschlager NF
    Clin Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 36(10):634-7. PubMed ID: 24105924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. INvestigation on Routine Follow-up in CONgestive HearT FAilure Patients with Remotely Monitored Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators SysTems (InContact).
    Hansen C; Loges C; Seidl K; Eberhardt F; Tröster H; Petrov K; Grönefeld G; Bramlage P; Birkenhauer F; Weiss C
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2018 Jun; 18(1):131. PubMed ID: 29954340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EuroEco (European Health Economic Trial on Home Monitoring in ICD Patients): a provider perspective in five European countries on costs and net financial impact of follow-up with or without remote monitoring.
    Heidbuchel H; Hindricks G; Broadhurst P; Van Erven L; Fernandez-Lozano I; Rivero-Ayerza M; Malinowski K; Marek A; Romero Garrido RF; Löscher S; Beeton I; Garcia E; Cross S; Vijgen J; Koivisto UM; Peinado R; Smala A; Annemans L
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Jan; 36(3):158-69. PubMed ID: 25179766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term patient satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring: a comparison among different systems.
    Artico J; Zecchin M; Zorzin Fantasia A; Skerl G; Ortis B; Franco S; Albani S; Barbati G; Cristallini J; Cannata' A; Sinagra G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2019 Aug; 20(8):542-550. PubMed ID: 31107287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study.
    Varma N
    Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 18035071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial.
    Varma N; Epstein AE; Irimpen A; Schweikert R; Love C;
    Circulation; 2010 Jul; 122(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 20625110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices: a time and activity analysis.
    Cronin EM; Ching EA; Varma N; Martin DO; Wilkoff BL; Lindsay BD
    Heart Rhythm; 2012 Dec; 9(12):1947-51. PubMed ID: 22864266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.