These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32343124)

  • 1. Economic and Environmental Feasibility of Second-Life Lithium-Ion Batteries as Fast-Charging Energy Storage.
    Kamath D; Arsenault R; Kim HC; Anctil A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 54(11):6878-6887. PubMed ID: 32343124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the cost and carbon footprint of second-life electric vehicle batteries in residential and utility-level applications.
    Kamath D; Shukla S; Arsenault R; Kim HC; Anctil A
    Waste Manag; 2020 Jul; 113():497-507. PubMed ID: 32513441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Second life batteries lifespan: Rest of useful life and environmental analysis.
    Casals LC; Amante García B; Canal C
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():354-363. PubMed ID: 30496965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental and economic evaluation of remanufacturing lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles.
    Xiong S; Ji J; Ma X
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():579-586. PubMed ID: 31770692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental Benefit Assessment of Second-Life Use of Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries in Multiple Scenarios Considering Performance Degradation and Economic Value.
    Cui J; Tan Q; Liu L; Li J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jun; 57(23):8559-8567. PubMed ID: 37272409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles: Implications of future electricity mix and different battery end-of-life management.
    Koroma MS; Costa D; Philippot M; Cardellini G; Hosen MS; Coosemans T; Messagie M
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 831():154859. PubMed ID: 35358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal number of charging station and pricing strategy for the electric vehicle with component commonality considering consumer range anxiety.
    Yu W; Zhang L; Lu R; Ma J
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0283320. PubMed ID: 37155615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental trade-offs and externalities of electrochemical-based batteries: Quantitative analysis between lithium-ion and vanadium redox flow units.
    Tsai WS; Huang C; Huang CC; Yang CC; Lee M
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 326(Pt B):116807. PubMed ID: 36436249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the state of Lithium-Sulphur and lithium-ion batteries applied to electromobility.
    Benveniste G; Rallo H; Canals Casals L; Merino A; Amante B
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 226():1-12. PubMed ID: 30103198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and simulation of 4 kW solar power-based hybrid EV charging station.
    Singla P; Boora S; Singhal P; Mittal N; Mittal V; Gared F
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):7336. PubMed ID: 38538667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of end-of-life electric vehicle batteries in China: Future scenarios and economic benefits.
    Jiang S; Zhang L; Hua H; Liu X; Wu H; Yuan Z
    Waste Manag; 2021 Nov; 135():70-78. PubMed ID: 34478950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second-life battery systems for affordable energy access in Kenyan primary schools.
    Kebir N; Leonard A; Downey M; Jones B; Rabie K; Bhagavathy SM; Hirmer SA
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1374. PubMed ID: 36697469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Private and External Costs and Benefits of Replacing High-Emitting Peaker Plants with Batteries.
    Porzio J; Wolfson D; Auffhammer M; Scown CD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Mar; 57(12):4992-5002. PubMed ID: 36917208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cooperative operation strategy of electric vehicle and photovoltaic power station considering carbon reduction benefit under dynamic electricity price.
    Guo D; Li J; Zhang S; Liu R; Sun F; Zhang H; Ma P; Li J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(40):92922-92936. PubMed ID: 37501026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Idealized analysis of relative values of bidirectional versus unidirectional electric vehicle charging in deeply decarbonized electricity systems.
    Dioha MO; Ruggles TH; Ashfaq S; Caldeira K
    iScience; 2022 Sep; 25(9):104906. PubMed ID: 36060055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative life cycle environmental assessment between electric taxi and gasoline taxi in Beijing].
    Shi XQ; Sun ZX; Li XN; Li JX; Yang JX
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1105-16. PubMed ID: 25929083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts.
    Sheppard CJR; Jenn AT; Greenblatt JB; Bauer GS; Gerke BF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 55(5):3229-3239. PubMed ID: 33566604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries at all temperatures.
    Yang XG; Zhang G; Ge S; Wang CY
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jul; 115(28):7266-7271. PubMed ID: 29941558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative life cycle assessment of battery storage systems for stationary applications.
    Hiremath M; Derendorf K; Vogt T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):4825-33. PubMed ID: 25798660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of the life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: Considering the influence of batteries.
    Xia X; Li P
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 814():152870. PubMed ID: 34990672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.