These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32344013)

  • 1. Right between the eyes: Corrugator muscle activity tracks the changing pleasantness of repeated slow stroking touch.
    Ree A; Bendas J; Pabel L; Croy I; Sailer U
    Physiol Behav; 2020 Aug; 222():112903. PubMed ID: 32344013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. C-tactile afferent stimulating touch carries a positive affective value.
    Pawling R; Cannon PR; McGlone FP; Walker SC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173457. PubMed ID: 28282451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Putting a good face on touch: Facial expression reflects the affective valence of caress-like touch across modalities.
    Mayo LM; Lindé J; Olausson H; Heilig M; Morrison I
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Sep; 137():83-90. PubMed ID: 30003943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Touch satiety: differential effects of stroking velocity on liking and wanting touch over repetitions.
    Triscoli C; Ackerley R; Sailer U
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113425. PubMed ID: 25405620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Touch targeting C-tactile afferent fibers has a unique physiological pattern: A combined electrodermal and facial electromyography study.
    Ree A; Mayo LM; Leknes S; Sailer U
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():55-63. PubMed ID: 30468895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pleasant Stroke Touch on Human Back by a Human and a Robot.
    Ishikura T; Kitamura Y; Sato W; Takamatsu J; Yuguchi A; Cho SG; Ding M; Yoshikawa S; Ogasawara T
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modulation of facial muscle responses by another person's presence and affiliative touch during affective image viewing.
    Wingenbach TSH; Ribeiro B; Nakao C; Boggio PS
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Feb; 38(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 37712676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot touch with speech boosts positive emotions.
    Sawabe T; Honda S; Sato W; Ishikura T; Kanbara M; Yoshikawa S; Fujimoto Y; Kato H
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6884. PubMed ID: 35477945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial responses of adult humans during the anticipation and consumption of touch and food rewards.
    Korb S; Massaccesi C; Gartus A; Lundström JN; Rumiati R; Eisenegger C; Silani G
    Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104044. PubMed ID: 31499297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Touch between romantic partners: Being stroked is more pleasant than stroking and decelerates heart rate.
    Triscoli C; Croy I; Olausson H; Sailer U
    Physiol Behav; 2017 Aug; 177():169-175. PubMed ID: 28478031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delivery of pleasant stroke touch via robot in older adults.
    Ishikura T; Sato W; Takamatsu J; Yuguchi A; Cho SG; Ding M; Yoshikawa S; Ogasawara T
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1292178. PubMed ID: 38264418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamics of Affective Habituation to Touch Differ on the Group and Individual Level.
    Bendas J; Ree A; Pabel L; Sailer U; Croy I
    Neuroscience; 2021 Jun; 464():44-52. PubMed ID: 33385487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual Variability of Pleasantness Ratings to Stroking Touch Over Different Velocities.
    Croy I; Bierling A; Sailer U; Ackerley R
    Neuroscience; 2021 Jun; 464():33-43. PubMed ID: 32224227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of MDMA on attention to positive social cues and pleasantness of affective touch.
    Bershad AK; Mayo LM; Van Hedger K; McGlone F; Walker SC; de Wit H
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2019 Sep; 44(10):1698-1705. PubMed ID: 31042696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hedonic Responses to Touch are Modulated by the Perceived Attractiveness of the Caresser.
    Novembre G; Etzi R; Morrison I
    Neuroscience; 2021 Jun; 464():79-89. PubMed ID: 33075458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex differences found in facial EMG activity provoked by viewing pleasant and unpleasant photographs.
    Huang HY; Hu S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Oct; 109(2):371-81. PubMed ID: 20037990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch.
    Keizer A; de Jong JR; Bartlema L; Dijkerman C
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 35():104-108. PubMed ID: 28958660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appraisal frames of pleasant and unpleasant pictures alter emotional responses as reflected in self-report and facial electromyographic activity.
    Wu L; Winkler MH; Andreatta M; Hajcak G; Pauli P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22561511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced pleasant touch appraisal in the presence of a disgusting odor.
    Croy I; Angelo SD; Olausson H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92975. PubMed ID: 24664177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans.
    McGlone F; Olausson H; Boyle JA; Jones-Gotman M; Dancer C; Guest S; Essick G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 35(11):1782-8. PubMed ID: 22594914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.