These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32344013)

  • 21. Oxytocin administration enhances pleasantness and neural responses to gentle stroking but not moderate pressure social touch by increasing peripheral concentrations.
    Chen Y; Zou H; Hou X; Lan C; Wang J; Qing Y; Chen W; Yao S; Kendrick KM
    Elife; 2023 May; 12():. PubMed ID: 37171081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans.
    Ree A; Morrison I; Olausson H; Sailer U; Heilig M; Mayo LM
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Mar; (145):. PubMed ID: 30933066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Disturbances in affective touch in hereditary sensory & autonomic neuropathy type III.
    Macefield VG; Norcliffe-Kaufmann L; Löken L; Axelrod FB; Kaufmann H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24726998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gentle stroking elicits somatosensory ERP that differentiates between hairy and glabrous skin.
    Schirmer A; Lai O; McGlone F; Cham C; Lau D
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 17(9):864-875. PubMed ID: 35277720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exposure shapes the perception of affective touch.
    Sailer U; Ackerley R
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 35():109-114. PubMed ID: 28818429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii.
    Larsen JT; Norris CJ; Cacioppo JT
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Sep; 40(5):776-85. PubMed ID: 14696731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness.
    van Hooijdonk R; Mathot S; Schat E; Spencer H; van der Stigchel S; Dijkerman HC
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jan; 237(1):201-210. PubMed ID: 30374784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic Stroking on the Face and Forearm: Touch Satiety and Effects on Mechanical Pain.
    Taneja P; Baad-Hansen L; Shaikh S; Svensson P; Olausson H
    Front Pain Res (Lausanne); 2021; 2():693987. PubMed ID: 35295499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Unmyelinated tactile cutaneous nerves signal erotic sensations.
    Jönsson EH; Backlund Wasling H; Wagnbeck V; Dimitriadis M; Georgiadis JR; Olausson H; Croy I
    J Sex Med; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1338-45. PubMed ID: 25970018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stroking hardness changes the perception of affective touch pleasantness across different skin sites.
    Yu J; Yang J; Yu Y; Wu Q; Takahashi S; Ejima Y; Wu J
    Heliyon; 2019 Aug; 5(8):e02141. PubMed ID: 31453390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stroking trajectory shapes velocity effects on pleasantness and other touch percepts.
    Schirmer A; Cham C; Lai O; Le TS; Ackerley R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 36355705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Physiological correlates of subjective emotional valence and arousal dynamics while viewing films.
    Sato W; Kochiyama T; Yoshikawa S
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Nov; 157():107974. PubMed ID: 33086090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stroking and tapping the skin: behavioral and electrodermal effects.
    Etzi R; Carta C; Gallace A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):453-461. PubMed ID: 29214391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Affective touch topography and body image.
    Cazzato V; Sacchetti S; Shin S; Makdani A; Trotter PD; McGlone F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0243680. PubMed ID: 34818341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. EMG activity in response to static and dynamic facial expressions.
    Rymarczyk K; Biele C; Grabowska A; Majczynski H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 21074582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physical activity does not disturb the measurement of startle and corrugator responses during affective picture viewing.
    Smith JC; O'Connor PJ
    Biol Psychol; 2003 Jul; 63(3):293-310. PubMed ID: 12853173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electromyographic responses to emotional facial expressions in 6-7year olds: a feasibility study.
    Deschamps PK; Schutte I; Kenemans JL; Matthys W; Schutter DJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 22634269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Authentic and posed emotional vocalizations trigger distinct facial responses.
    Lima CF; Arriaga P; Anikin A; Pires AR; Frade S; Neves L; Scott SK
    Cortex; 2021 Aug; 141():280-292. PubMed ID: 34102411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant touch at CT-optimized velocity.
    Triscoli C; Croy I; Steudte-Schmiedgen S; Olausson H; Sailer U
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Sep; 128():71-81. PubMed ID: 28723347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An unfamiliar social presence reduces facial disgust responses to food stimuli.
    Nath EC; Cannon PR; Philipp MC
    Food Res Int; 2019 Dec; 126():108662. PubMed ID: 31732049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.