These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32344045)

  • 1. Applying stochastic spike train theory for high-accuracy human MEG/EEG.
    Haumann NT; Hansen B; Huotilainen M; Vuust P; Brattico E
    J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Jul; 340():108743. PubMed ID: 32344045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the Performance of Popular MEG/EEG Artifact Correction Methods in an Evoked-Response Study.
    Haumann NT; Parkkonen L; Kliuchko M; Vuust P; Brattico E
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():7489108. PubMed ID: 27524998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spike separation from EEG/MEG data using morphological filter and wavelet transform.
    Jia W; Sclabassi RJ; Pon LS; Scheuer ML; Sun M
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6137-40. PubMed ID: 17946360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical Bayes evaluation of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction: Application to auditory mismatch evoked responses.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117468. PubMed ID: 33075561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral Independent Component Analysis with noise modeling for M/EEG source separation.
    Ablin P; Cardoso JF; Gramfort A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 May; 356():109144. PubMed ID: 33771653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The saccadic spike artifact in MEG.
    Carl C; Açık A; König P; Engel AK; Hipp JF
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1657-67. PubMed ID: 21963912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus.
    Deffke I; Sander T; Heidenreich J; Sommer W; Curio G; Trahms L; Lueschow A
    Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1495-501. PubMed ID: 17363282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.
    Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
    Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of mutual information on independent component analysis in EEG/MEG analysis: a simulation study.
    Neumann A; Grosse-Wentrup M; Buss M; Gramann K
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1534-46. PubMed ID: 18853332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Source analysis of interictal spikes in polymicrogyria: loss of relevant cortical fissures requires simultaneous EEG to avoid MEG misinterpretation.
    Bast T; Ramantani G; Boppel T; Metzke T; Ozkan O; Stippich C; Seitz A; Rupp A; Rating D; Scherg M
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 25(4):1232-41. PubMed ID: 15850741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of MEG in localizing irritative zone and seizure onset zone: Quantitative comparison between MEG and intracranial EEG.
    Kim D; Joo EY; Seo DW; Kim MY; Lee YH; Kwon HC; Kim JM; Hong SB
    Epilepsy Res; 2016 Nov; 127():291-301. PubMed ID: 27693985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MEG versus EEG: influence of background activity on interictal spike detection.
    Ramantani G; Boor R; Paetau R; Ille N; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Boppel T; Scherg M; Rating D; Bast T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 23(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 17143138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Iwasaki M; Pestana E; Burgess RC; Lüders HO; Shamoto H; Nakasato N
    Epilepsia; 2005 Jan; 46(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15660769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.