These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32344488)

  • 1. [On 'Negative control methods': related principles, methods and applications].
    Kan H; Zhang M; Zheng YJ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 41(4):594-598. PubMed ID: 32344488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brief Report: Negative Controls to Detect Selection Bias and Measurement Bias in Epidemiologic Studies.
    Arnold BF; Ercumen A; Benjamin-Chung J; Colford JM
    Epidemiology; 2016 Sep; 27(5):637-41. PubMed ID: 27182642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Negative control exposure studies in the presence of measurement error: implications for attempted effect estimate calibration.
    Sanderson E; Macdonald-Wallis C; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 47(2):587-596. PubMed ID: 29088358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative controls: a tool for detecting confounding and bias in observational studies.
    Lipsitch M; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; Cohen T
    Epidemiology; 2010 May; 21(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 20335814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invited Commentary: Beware the Test-Negative Design.
    Westreich D; Hudgens MG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 184(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 27587722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The control outcome calibration approach for causal inference with unobserved confounding.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 24363326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation.
    Genbäck M; de Luna X
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference.
    Hernán MA; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2011 May; 22(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 21399502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection of controls in case-control studies. III. Design options.
    Wacholder S; Silverman DT; McLaughlin JK; Mandel JS
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 May; 135(9):1042-50. PubMed ID: 1595690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using fathers as a negative control exposure: Implications of measurement bias.
    Rita Venugopal L; Varghese M T
    Scand J Public Health; 2020 Aug; 48(6):674-675. PubMed ID: 31291829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.
    Mansournia MA; Higgins JP; Sterne JA; Hernán MA
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 27748683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological Challenges When Studying Distance to Care as an Exposure in Health Research.
    Caniglia EC; Zash R; Swanson SA; Wirth KE; Diseko M; Mayondi G; Lockman S; Mmalane M; Makhema J; Dryden-Peterson S; Kponee-Shovein KZ; John O; Murray EJ; Shapiro RL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 188(9):1674-1681. PubMed ID: 31107529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reflection on modern methods: causal inference considerations for heterogeneous disease etiology.
    Nevo D; Ogino S; Wang M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 50(3):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 33484125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Definitions of Bias in Clinical Research.
    Warden G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():35-52. PubMed ID: 33871837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bounding Bias Due to Selection.
    Smith LH; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):509-516. PubMed ID: 31033690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative controls: Concepts and caveats.
    Penning de Vries BB; Groenwold RH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1576-1587. PubMed ID: 37338976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in identifying and controlling confounding bias].
    Liu HX; Wang HB; Wang N
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 41(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 32344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias in Clinical Research.
    Stuckless S; Parfrey PS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():17-34. PubMed ID: 33871836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limits for the Magnitude of M-bias and Certain Other Types of Structural Selection Bias.
    Flanders WD; Ye D
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 31033689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in methodologies of negative controls: a scoping review.
    Yang Q; Yang Z; Cai X; Zhao H; Jia J; Sun F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 166():111228. PubMed ID: 38040387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.