These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) versus titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) materials as bone anchored implants - Is one truly better than the other? Shah FA; Trobos M; Thomsen P; Palmquist A Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 May; 62():960-6. PubMed ID: 26952502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical characterization of structurally porous biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone replacement implants. Melancon D; Bagheri ZS; Johnston RB; Liu L; Tanzer M; Pasini D Acta Biomater; 2017 Nov; 63():350-368. PubMed ID: 28927929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revival of pure titanium for dynamically loaded porous implants using additive manufacturing. Wauthle R; Ahmadi SM; Amin Yavari S; Mulier M; Zadpoor AA; Weinans H; Van Humbeeck J; Kruth JP; Schrooten J Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Sep; 54():94-100. PubMed ID: 26046272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitution. Putra NE; Mirzaali MJ; Apachitei I; Zhou J; Zadpoor AA Acta Biomater; 2020 Jun; 109():1-20. PubMed ID: 32268239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Isolated and modulated effects of topology and material type on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured porous biomaterials. Hedayati R; Ahmadi SM; Lietaert K; Pouran B; Li Y; Weinans H; Rans CD; Zadpoor AA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Mar; 79():254-263. PubMed ID: 29335192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How does tissue regeneration influence the mechanical behavior of additively manufactured porous biomaterials? Hedayati R; Janbaz S; Sadighi M; Mohammadi-Aghdam M; Zadpoor AA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():831-841. PubMed ID: 27810729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Additively manufactured biodegradable porous metals. Li Y; Jahr H; Zhou J; Zadpoor AA Acta Biomater; 2020 Oct; 115():29-50. PubMed ID: 32853809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards Bandyopadhyay A; Mitra I; Shivaram A; Dasgupta N; Bose S Addit Manuf; 2019 Aug; 28():259-266. PubMed ID: 31406683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Additively manufactured porous tantalum implants. Wauthle R; van der Stok J; Amin Yavari S; Van Humbeeck J; Kruth JP; Zadpoor AA; Weinans H; Mulier M; Schrooten J Acta Biomater; 2015 Mar; 14():217-25. PubMed ID: 25500631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Full regeneration of segmental bone defects using porous titanium implants loaded with BMP-2 containing fibrin gels. van der Stok J; Koolen MK; de Maat MP; Yavari SA; Alblas J; Patka P; Verhaar JA; van Lieshout EM; Zadpoor AA; Weinans H; Jahr H Eur Cell Mater; 2015 Mar; 29():141-53; discussion 153-4. PubMed ID: 25738583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical Role of Etching Parameters in the Evolution of Nano Micro SLA Surface on the Ti6Al4V Alloy Dental Implants. Chauhan P; Koul V; Bhatnagar N Materials (Basel); 2021 Oct; 14(21):. PubMed ID: 34771869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Additively manufactured biodegradable porous zinc. Li Y; Pavanram P; Zhou J; Lietaert K; Taheri P; Li W; San H; Leeflang MA; Mol JMC; Jahr H; Zadpoor AA Acta Biomater; 2020 Jan; 101():609-623. PubMed ID: 31672587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]