These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32345029)

  • 1. Towards a national perioperative clinical quality registry: The diagnostic accuracy of administrative data in identifying major postoperative complications.
    Reilly JR; Shulman MA; Gilbert AM; Jomon B; Thompson RJ; Nicholson JJ; Burke JA; Lehane DN; Liaw CM; Mahoney AJ; Stark PA; Hales L; Myles PS
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2020 May; 48(3):203-212. PubMed ID: 32345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of administrative data and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data in a New South Wales Hospital.
    Richardson A; Pang T; Hitos K; Toh JWT; Johnston E; Morgan G; Zeng M; Mazevska D; McElduff P
    ANZ J Surg; 2020 May; 90(5):734-739. PubMed ID: 31840381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnostic criteria and risk assessment of complications after gastric cancer surgery in western countries].
    Wu Z; Wang Q; Shi J; Cherry K; Desiderio J; Li Z; Ji J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):135-139. PubMed ID: 28226344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What are the real rates of postoperative complications: elucidating inconsistencies between administrative and clinical data sources.
    Koch CG; Li L; Hixson E; Tang A; Phillips S; Henderson JM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 May; 214(5):798-805. PubMed ID: 22421260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Both Clinical Registry and Administrative Claims Data to Measure Risk-adjusted Surgical Outcomes.
    Lawson EH; Louie R; Zingmond DS; Sacks GD; Brook RH; Hall BL; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2016 Jan; 263(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 25405553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of perioperative pulmonary aspiration in children using quality assurance and hospital administrative billing data.
    Eisler L; Huang G; Lee KM; Busse JA; Sun M; Lin AY; Sun LS; Ing C
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 28(3):218-225. PubMed ID: 29341336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data.
    Henderson T; Shepheard J; Sundararajan V
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11):1011-9. PubMed ID: 17063133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Best WR; Khuri SF; Phelan M; Hur K; Henderson WG; Demakis JG; Daley J
    J Am Coll Surg; 2002 Mar; 194(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 11893128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care.
    Lawson EH; Zingmond DS; Hall BL; Louie R; Brook RH; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2015 Feb; 261(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 25569029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are we recording postoperative complications correctly? Comparison of NHS Hospital Episode Statistics with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Parthasarathy M; Reid V; Pyne L; Groot-Wassink T
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Sep; 24(9):594-602. PubMed ID: 25991866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Outcomes After TKA: Do All Databases Produce Similar Findings?
    Bedard NA; Pugely AJ; McHugh M; Lux N; Otero JE; Bozic KJ; Gao Y; Callaghan JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 29529616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are administrative data valid when measuring patient safety in hospitals? A comparison of data collection methods using a chart review and administrative data.
    Maass C; Kuske S; Lessing C; Schrappe M
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2015 Aug; 27(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 26133382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of ICD-9-based, retrospective, and prospective assessments of perioperative complications: assessment of accuracy in reporting.
    Campbell PG; Malone J; Yadla S; Chitale R; Nasser R; Maltenfort MG; Vaccaro A; Ratliff JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 21142455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of Administrative Coding in Identifying Inpatient Acute Strokes Complicating Procedures or Other Diseases in UK Hospitals.
    Li L; Binney LE; Carter S; Gutnikov SA; Beebe S; Bowsher-Brown K; Silver LE; Rothwell PM;
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Jul; 8(14):e012995. PubMed ID: 31266385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of administrative and clinical registry data in reporting postoperative complications after surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
    Awad MI; Shuman AG; Montero PH; Palmer FL; Shah JP; Patel SG
    Head Neck; 2015 Jun; 37(6):851-61. PubMed ID: 24623622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of administrative coding data in colorectal cancer resections and short-term outcomes.
    MacCallum C; Da Silva N; Gibbs P; Thomson BNJ; Skandarajah A; Hayes I
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):876-881. PubMed ID: 30074298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the ICD-10 system in coding revascularisation procedures in patients with peripheral arterial disease in England: A retrospective cohort study using national administrative and clinical databases.
    Birmpili P; Atkins E; Li Q; Johal AS; Waton S; Williams R; Pherwani AD; Cromwell DA
    EClinicalMedicine; 2023 Jan; 55():101738. PubMed ID: 36386037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the Inter-Rater Reliability Rate Is Mandatory for Improving the Quality of a Medical Database: Experience with the Paulista Lung Cancer Registry.
    Lauricella LL; Costa PB; Salati M; Pego-Fernandes PM; Terra RM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jun; 226(6):1128-1136. PubMed ID: 29551696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. (Dis)concordance of comorbidity data and cancer status across administrative datasets, medical charts, and self-reports.
    Sheriffdeen A; Millar JL; Martin C; Evans M; Tikellis G; Evans SM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):858. PubMed ID: 32917193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.