303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32345213)
21. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Accuracy and Bias of Single-Step Genomic Prediction for Populations Under Selection.
Hsu WL; Garrick DJ; Fernando RL
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Aug; 7(8):2685-2694. PubMed ID: 28642364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction of genetic merit for growth rate in pigs using animal models with indirect genetic effects and genomic information.
Poulsen BG; Ask B; Nielsen HM; Ostersen T; Christensen OF
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Oct; 52(1):58. PubMed ID: 33028188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genomic selection across multiple breeding cycles in applied bread wheat breeding.
Michel S; Ametz C; Gungor H; Epure D; Grausgruber H; Löschenberger F; Buerstmayr H
Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Jun; 129(6):1179-89. PubMed ID: 27067826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genomic prediction with multiple biparental families.
Brauner PC; Müller D; Molenaar WS; Melchinger AE
Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jan; 133(1):133-147. PubMed ID: 31595337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genome-wide associations and detection of potential candidate genes for direct genetic and maternal genetic effects influencing dairy cattle body weight at different ages.
Yin T; König S
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):4. PubMed ID: 30727969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A specific prediction equation is necessary to estimate peak oxygen uptake in obese patients with metabolic syndrome.
Debeaumont D; Tardif C; Folope V; Castres I; Lemaitre F; Tourny C; Dechelotte P; Thill C; Darmon A; Coquart JB
J Endocrinol Invest; 2016 Jun; 39(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 26694707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Utility of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction.
Raymond B; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Houwing-Duistermaat J; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):27. PubMed ID: 29776327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A fast indirect method to compute functions of genomic relationships concerning genotyped and ungenotyped individuals, for diversity management.
Colleau JJ; Palhière I; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):87. PubMed ID: 29191178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predicting the effect of reference population on the accuracy of within, across, and multibreed genomic prediction.
van den Berg I; Meuwissen THE; MacLeod IM; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3155-3174. PubMed ID: 30738664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 97(11):4418-4427. PubMed ID: 31539424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving accuracy of bulls' predicted genomic breeding values for fertility using daughters' milk progesterone profiles.
Tenghe AMM; Bouwman AC; Berglund B; de Koning DJ; Veerkamp RF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5177-5193. PubMed ID: 29525306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fixed-length haplotypes can improve genomic prediction accuracy in an admixed dairy cattle population.
Hess M; Druet T; Hess A; Garrick D
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):54. PubMed ID: 28673233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of genomic prediction when combining two related crossbred populations.
Vallée A; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4342-8. PubMed ID: 25149337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
