389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32345284)
1. Cervical cancer screening program based on primary DNA-HPV testing in a Brazilian city: a cost-effectiveness study protocol.
Teixeira JC; Vale DB; Bragança JF; Campos CS; Discacciati MG; Zeferino LC
BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):576. PubMed ID: 32345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women: an economic evaluation in a middle-income country.
Vanni T; Luz PM; Grinsztejn B; Veloso VG; Foss A; Mesa-Frias M; Legood R
Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):E96-104. PubMed ID: 21964797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.
van Rosmalen J; de Kok IM; van Ballegooijen M
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 22251259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection and genotyping of HPV-DNA through different types of diagnostic platforms in liquid-based cervical-cytology samples.
Cassani B; Soldano G; Finocchiaro D; Conti S; Bulfamante A; Lemorini G; Bulfamante G
Pathologica; 2018 Dec; 110(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 30799441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Three Approaches for Cervical Cancer Screening among HIV-Positive Women in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lince-Deroche N; Phiri J; Michelow P; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141969. PubMed ID: 26569487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.
Kim JJ; Burger EA; Sy S; Campos NG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Feb; 109(2):. PubMed ID: 27754955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Québec, Canada.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Mayrand MH; Santas CC; Goggin P
Can J Public Health; 2010; 101(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 20737813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.
Östensson E; Hellström AC; Hellman K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Wilander E; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 23530870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of HPV self-testing offered to non-attendees in cervical cancer screening in Switzerland.
Vassilakos P; Poncet A; Catarino R; Viviano M; Petignat P; Combescure C
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 30718124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic evaluation of strategies for managing women with equivocal cytological results in Brazil.
Vanni T; Legood R; Franco EL; Villa LL; Luz PM; Schwartsmann G
Int J Cancer; 2011 Aug; 129(3):671-9. PubMed ID: 20886598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost effectiveness analysis of HPV primary screening and dual stain cytology triage compared with cervical cytology.
Termrungruanglert W; Khemapech N; Tantitamit T; Havanond P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 30(2):e17. PubMed ID: 30740950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.
Lew JB; Simms KT; Smith MA; Hall M; Kang YJ; Xu XM; Caruana M; Velentzis LS; Bessell T; Saville M; Hammond I; Canfell K
Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb; 2(2):e96-e107. PubMed ID: 29253402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation and budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening using cobas 4800 HPV screening technology in the public sector of South Africa.
Dreyer G; Maske C; Stander M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221495. PubMed ID: 31509545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.
Felix JC; Lacey MJ; Miller JD; Lenhart GM; Spitzer M; Kulkarni R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jun; 25(6):606-16. PubMed ID: 27023044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in routine cervical scraping samples: use for a national cervical cancer screening program in a developing nation.
Othman N; Othman NH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(5):2245-9. PubMed ID: 24716964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study.
Aarnio R; Östensson E; Olovsson M; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jul; 20(1):645. PubMed ID: 32660432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized controlled trial of human papillomavirus testing versus Pap cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer precursors: design, methods and preliminary accrual results of the Canadian cervical cancer screening trial (CCCaST).
Mayrand MH; Duarte-Franco E; Coutlée F; Rodrigues I; Walter SD; Ratnam S; Franco EL;
Int J Cancer; 2006 Aug; 119(3):615-23. PubMed ID: 16572425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
