These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32346721)
1. SuperPlots: Communicating reproducibility and variability in cell biology. Lord SJ; Velle KB; Mullins RD; Fritz-Laylin LK J Cell Biol; 2020 Jun; 219(6):. PubMed ID: 32346721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining sample size for a binary diagnostic test in the presence of verification bias. Shan G; Zhang H; Jiang T J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1193-1202. PubMed ID: 29553878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculation of confidence intervals for a finite population size. Julious SA Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 30411472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size and power calculation for molecular biology studies. Jung SH Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 620():203-18. PubMed ID: 20652505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach. Stevens NT; Steiner SH; MacKay RJ Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2487-2504. PubMed ID: 26335274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical inference of risk difference in K correlated 2 x 2 tables with structural zero. Wang SF; Tang NS; Zhang B; Wang XR Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 19152229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples. Savalei V Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):352-370. PubMed ID: 29781637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient experimental design for binary matched pairs data. Lennox KP; Sherman M Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2952-66. PubMed ID: 19691023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How well do multiple testing methods scale up when both n and k increase? Westfall PH; Manage A J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 21516558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics. Motulsky HJ J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2014 Oct; 351(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 25204545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical evaluation of a biomarker. Ray P; Le Manach Y; Riou B; Houle TT Anesthesiology; 2010 Apr; 112(4):1023-40. PubMed ID: 20234303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comments on 'Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis' by JJ Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2009; 26, Published online, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3607. Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Schumacher M Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2963-5; author reply 2965-6. PubMed ID: 21104939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size planning for survival prediction with focus on high-dimensional data. Götte H; Zwiener I Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(5):787-807. PubMed ID: 22859340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The upstrap. Crainiceanu CM; Crainiceanu A Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):e164-e166. PubMed ID: 30252026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): how should I interpret reports of measurement properties? A practical guide for clinicians and researchers who are not biostatisticians. Davidson M; Keating J Br J Sports Med; 2014 May; 48(9):792-6. PubMed ID: 23258849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Explorations in statistics: power. Curran-Everett D Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Jun; 34(2):41-3. PubMed ID: 20522895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Basic biostatistics for post-graduate students. Dakhale GN; Hiware SK; Shinde AT; Mahatme MS Indian J Pharmacol; 2012; 44(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 23087501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Setting the bar for cell biology best practices. Schwarzbauer JE; Leader WM; Drubin DG Mol Biol Cell; 2016 Sep; 27(18):2803. PubMed ID: 27634742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]