BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32346807)

  • 21. Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.
    Polónia A; Leitão D; Schmitt F
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Apr; 468(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 26754674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. HER2 Gene Amplification Testing by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH): Comparison of the ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guidelines With FISH Scores Used for Enrollment in Breast Cancer International Research Group Clinical Trials.
    Press MF; Sauter G; Buyse M; Fourmanoir H; Quinaux E; Tsao-Wei DD; Eiermann W; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Mackey JR; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Campeau A; Mirlacher M; Lindsay MA; Slamon DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3518-3528. PubMed ID: 27573653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of an alternative chromosome 17 probe and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines on fluorescence in situ hybridization for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
    Donaldson AR; Shetty S; Wang Z; Rivera CL; Portier BP; Budd GT; Downs-Kelly E; Lanigan CP; Calhoun BC
    Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(12):2230-2239. PubMed ID: 28192599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
    Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. HER2 testing and its predictive utility in anti-HER2 breast cancer therapy.
    Advani PP; Crozier JA; Perez EA
    Biomark Med; 2015; 9(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 25605454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of the 2013 ASCO-CAP HER2 Testing Guideline on the Management of IHC/HER2 2+ Invasive Breast Cancer.
    Yamada M; Kubo M; Yamamoto H; Yamashita N; Kai M; Zaguirre K; Kaneshiro K; Shimazaki A; Hayashi S; Kawaji H; Mori M; Oda Y; Nakamura M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Aug; 41(8):4143-4149. PubMed ID: 34281885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictive markers in breast cancer: An update on ER and HER2 testing and reporting.
    Calhoun BC; Collins LC
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2015 Sep; 32(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 25770732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ASCO/CAP 2018 breast cancer HER2 testing guidelines: summary of pertinent recommendations for practice in Australia.
    Farshid G; Bilous M; Morey A; Fox S; Lakhani S; Loi S; Bell R; Spillane A
    Pathology; 2019 Jun; 51(4):345-348. PubMed ID: 31076089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
    Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative Analysis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer According to 2007 and 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations.
    Hanna WM; Slodkowska E; Lu FI; Nafisi H; Nofech-Mozes S
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Sep; 35(26):3039-3045. PubMed ID: 28445098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) Practice Guideline Update on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Analysis.
    Wei CH; Garcia L; Murata-Collins J; Schmolze D; Apple S
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):887-890. PubMed ID: 33112946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
    Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry.
    Muller KE; Marotti JD; Memoli VA; Wells WA; Tafe LJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Aug; 144(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 26185309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) -Negative and Adjuvant Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancers: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario Clinical Practice Guideline.
    Denduluri N; Somerfield MR; Eisen A; Holloway JN; Hurria A; King TA; Lyman GH; Partridge AH; Telli ML; Trudeau ME; Wolff AC
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jul; 34(20):2416-27. PubMed ID: 27091714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry.
    Taylor VJ; Barnes PJ; Godwin SC; Bethune GC
    Virchows Arch; 2021 Jul; 479(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 33527151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of repeat HER2 testing after initial equivocal HER2 FISH results using 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines.
    Xu FP; Wang K; Xu J; Chen J; Zhang YF; Wu HM; Zhang MH; Long XX; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Lin DY; Liu YH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):757-764. PubMed ID: 28861637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
    Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
    Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.
    McLemore LE; Albarracin CT; Gruschkus SK; Bassett RL; Wu Y; Dhamne S; Yim I; Lin K; Bedrosian I; Sneige N; Chen H
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33813685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An Evaluation of Clinicopathological Correlation and Outcome of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Subgroups Reclassified According to the Latest ASCO/CAP Guideline.
    Wang C; Tsang JY; Poon IK; Shao Y; Li JJ; Shea KH; Hlaing T; Wong SI; Tse GM
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jan; 22(1):e114-e122. PubMed ID: 34119429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 reporting guidelines in breast cancer: An assessment study from Indian oncology centre that primarily performs HER2 IHC testing with special emphasis on IHC equivocal category.
    Pasricha S; Gupta G; Garg R; Sharma A; Gandhi JS; Durga G; Kamboj M; Grover S; Mehta A
    Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 29251392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.