These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32347586)

  • 61. Medical research: Trial unpredictability yields predictable therapy gains.
    Djulbegovic B; Kumar A; Glasziou P; Miladinovic B; Chalmers I
    Nature; 2013 Aug; 500(7463):395-6. PubMed ID: 23969443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Evaluating the extent of clinical uncertainty among treatment options for patients with early-onset scoliosis.
    Corona J; Miller DJ; Downs J; Akbarnia BA; Betz RR; Blakemore LC; Campbell RM; Flynn JM; Johnston CE; McCarthy RE; Roye DP; Skaggs DL; Smith JT; Snyder BD; Sponseller PD; Sturm PF; Thompson GH; Yazici M; Vitale MG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 May; 95(10):e67. PubMed ID: 23677368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Ethics of research in perinatal medicine.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Semin Perinatol; 2009 Dec; 33(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 19914524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Balancing equivalence and equipoise in medical education research.
    Walsh K
    Fam Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):275. PubMed ID: 22481160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. There is another exchange on equipoise and uncertainty.
    Sackett DL
    BMJ; 2001 Mar; 322(7289):795-6. PubMed ID: 11282879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The tension between educational equivalency and equipoise in medical education research.
    Egan M; Mainous AG
    Fam Med; 2012 Jan; 44(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 22241334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Response to open peer commentaries on "What is the best standard for the standard of care in clinical research?".
    van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ
    Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):W7-8. PubMed ID: 19998101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Ethics and nutritional support in the intensive care unit.
    Knox LS
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 1993 Mar; 5(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8447994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. NICE should not intervene where there is equipoise by virtue of insufficient evidence.
    Mohindra RK
    Heart; 2010 Aug; 96(16):1333; author reply 1333. PubMed ID: 20659955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials.
    Miller FG; Brody H
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research.
    Freedman B
    N Engl J Med; 1987 Jul; 317(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 3600702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The Limits and Hazards of Clinical Equipoise on Cardiology Study Design and Conduct.
    Miller FG; Dickert NW
    JAMA Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 3(9):791-792. PubMed ID: 29955806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Ethics of Placebo Control in Trials for Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Counterpoint.
    Shuman AG
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Jul; 155(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 27371620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Community equipoise and the architecture of clinical research.
    Karlawish JH; Lantos J
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(4):385-96. PubMed ID: 9292216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Heterogeneous perception of the ethical legitimacy of unbalanced randomization by institutional review board members: a clinical vignette-based survey.
    Dibao-Dina C; Caille A; Giraudeau B
    Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):440. PubMed ID: 30107812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Clinical Equipoise.
    Benzel E
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Sep; 153():xiii. PubMed ID: 34420778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Equipoise: an appropriate standard for ethical review of nursing research?
    Olsen DP
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Feb; 31(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 10672082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Equipoise: a case study of the views of clinicians involved in two neonatal trials.
    Garcia J; Elbourne D; Snowdon C
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 16281889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Patient-centred equipoise and the ethics of randomised controlled trials.
    Olson LG
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2002 Apr; 21(2):S55-67. PubMed ID: 15828162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The irrelevance of equipoise.
    Veatch RM
    J Med Philos; 2007; 32(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 17454421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.