189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32348170)
1. Application of panoramic radiography with a multilayer imaging program for detecting proximal caries: a preliminary clinical study.
Jeon KJ; Han SS; Lee C; Choi YJ; Jung HI; Kim YH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Dec; 49(8):20190467. PubMed ID: 32348170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.
Terry GL; Noujeim M; Langlais RP; Moore WS; Prihoda TJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150159. PubMed ID: 26869221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Digital Bitewing Radiography versus Different Views of Digital Panoramic Radiography for Detection of Proximal Caries.
Abdinian M; Razavi SM; Faghihian R; Samety AA; Faghihian E
J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Apr; 12(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 26622284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Observer differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with computed dental radiography.
Kang BC; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Oct; 82(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 8899789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Occlusal caries diagnosis in molar teeth from bitewing and panoramic radiographs.
Thomas MF; Ricketts DN; Wilson RF
Prim Dent Care; 2001 Apr; 8(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 11405049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparison of two panoramic modalities and posterior bite-wing radiography in the detection of proximal dental caries.
Scarfe WC; Langlais RP; Nummikoski P; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Deahl ST; Yuan CH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 8139839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low reproducibility between oral radiologists and general dentists with regards to radiographic diagnosis of caries.
Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Pakkala T; Haukka J; Siukosaari P
Acta Odontol Scand; 2018 Jul; 76(5):346-350. PubMed ID: 29648497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
