255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32348603)
1. Clinical impact of leakage in patients with handsewn vs stapled anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: a retrospective study.
Espin E; Vallribera F; Kreisler E; Biondo S
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Oct; 22(10):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 32348603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased Leak Rates Following Stapled Versus Handsewn Ileocolic Anastomosis in Patients with Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Nordholm-Carstensen A; Schnack Rasmussen M; Krarup PM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 May; 62(5):542-548. PubMed ID: 30489322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of anastomotic technique on early postoperative outcome in open right-sided hemicolectomy.
Jurowich C; Lichthardt S; Matthes N; Kastner C; Haubitz I; Prock A; Filser J; Germer CT; Wiegering A
BJS Open; 2019 Apr; 3(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 30957068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after right hemicolectomy.
Jessen M; Nerstrøm M; Wilbek TE; Roepstorff S; Rasmussen MS; Krarup PM
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1619-24. PubMed ID: 27392778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ileocolic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: stapled end-to-side, stapled side-to-side, or handsewn?
Rajan R; Arachchi A; Metlapalli M; Lo J; Ratinam R; Nguyen TC; Teoh WMK; Lim JT; Chouhan H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Mar; 37(3):673-681. PubMed ID: 35124716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: does the anastomotic configuration affect short-term outcomes?
Rajagopalan A; Centauri S; Antoniou E; Arachchi A; Tay YK; Chouhan H; Lim JT; Nguyen TC; Narasimhan V; Teoh WMK
ANZ J Surg; 2023; 93(7-8):1870-1876. PubMed ID: 37259620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multicentre, prospective cohort study of handsewn versus stapled intracorporeal anastomosis for robotic hemicolectomy.
Harji D; Rouanet P; Cotte E; Dubois A; Rullier E; Pezet D; Passot G; Taoum C; Denost Q
Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 24(7):862-867. PubMed ID: 35167182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie A; Fitzgerald A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD004320. PubMed ID: 21901690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie AE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004320. PubMed ID: 17636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for leak, complications and mortality after ileocolic anastomosis: comparison of two anastomotic techniques.
Sánchez-Guillén L; Frasson M; García-Granero Á; Pellino G; Flor-Lorente B; Álvarez-Sarrado E; García-Granero E
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2019 Nov; 101(8):571-578. PubMed ID: 31672036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stapled vs handsewn anastomosis and anastomotic leaks in gastric cancer surgery-a population-based nationwide study in Finland.
Kvist E; Helminen O; Helmiö M; Huhta H; Jalkanen A; Junttila A; Kallio R; Koivukangas V; Kokkola A; Laine S; Lietzen E; Louhimo J; Meriläinen S; Pohjanen VM; Rantanen T; Ristimäki A; Räsänen JV; Saarnio J; Sihvo E; Toikkanen V; Tyrväinen T; Valtola A; Kauppila JH;
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(6):820-823. PubMed ID: 38599994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery.
Resegotti A; Astegiano M; Farina EC; Ciccone G; Avagnina G; Giustetto A; Campra D; Fronda GR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 15719193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Handsewn versus stapled anastomosis in penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: a multicenter study.
Demetriades D; Murray JA; Chan LS; Ordoñez C; Bowley D; Nagy KK; Cornwell EE; Velmahos GC; Muñoz N; Hatzitheofilou C; Schwab CW; Rodriguez A; Cornejo C; Davis KA; Namias N; Wisner DH; Ivatury RR; Moore EE; Acosta JA; Maull KI; Thomason MH; Spain DA
J Trauma; 2002 Jan; 52(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 11791061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
Neutzling CB; Lustosa SA; Proenca IM; da Silva EM; Matos D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003144. PubMed ID: 22336786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anastomotic technique is not associated with leakage rate after right hemicolectomy.
Juvik AF; Nielsen S; Tolstrup MB; Lykke J; Klein M
Dan Med J; 2020 Aug; 67(9):. PubMed ID: 32800067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anastomosis technique and leakage rates in minimally invasive surgery for right-sided colon cancer. A retrospective national cohort study.
Würtz HJ; Bundgaard L; Rahr HB; Frostberg E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Mar; 37(3):701-708. PubMed ID: 35150297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early postoperative complications after stapled vs handsewn restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 148 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli: a matched-pair analysis.
Ganschow P; Warth R; Hinz U; Büchler MW; Kadmon M
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Feb; 16(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 23941307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for leak after double-stapled colorectal anastomosis: An institutional analysis of 800 patients.
García-Granero E; Navarro F; Cerdán Santacruz C; Frasson M; García-Granero A; Marinello F; Flor-Lorente B; Espí A
Surgery; 2017 Nov; 162(5):1006-1016. PubMed ID: 28739093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
Lustosa SA; Matos D; Atallah AN; Castro AA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD003144. PubMed ID: 11687041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]