BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32349138)

  • 1. Are adenoma and serrated polyp detection rates correlated with endoscopists' sensitivity of optical diagnosis?
    Bronzwaer MES; Vleugels JLA; van Doorn SC; Dijkgraaf MGW; Fockens P; Dekker E;
    Endoscopy; 2020 Sep; 52(9):763-772. PubMed ID: 32349138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center.
    Mandaliya R; Baig K; Barnhill M; Murugesan V; Som A; Mohammed U; Jhaveri K; Vangimalla SS; Raymond A; Tran J; Hasan L; Lewis JH; Cho W
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(9):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 31152331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening.
    Bronzwaer MES; Greuter MJE; Bleijenberg AGC; IJspeert JEG; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):465. PubMed ID: 29695244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection rates for adenomas, serrated polyps and clinically relevant serrated polyps can be easily estimated by individually calculated detection rate ratios.
    Buerger M; Kasper P; Scheller I; Hofer JH; Toermer H; Stelzer A; Stenschke F; Stollenwerk M; Allo G; Goeser T; Steffen HM; Schramm C
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):745-751. PubMed ID: 32524866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
    Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substantial and sustained improvement of serrated polyp detection after a simple educational intervention: results from a prospective controlled trial.
    Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; Bargeman M; Koornstra JJ; van Herwaarden YJ; Spaander MC; Sanduleanu S; Bastiaansen BAJ; Schoon EJ; van Lelyveld N; Dekker E; IJspeert JEG
    Gut; 2020 Dec; 69(12):2150-2158. PubMed ID: 32139550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bleijenberg AGC; Depla A; Montazeri NSM; Dekker E
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jun; 56(6):412-420. PubMed ID: 38191001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of comprehensive optical diagnosis training using Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis classification on detection of adenoma and sessile serrated lesion.
    Lee J; Bae JH; Chung SJ; Kang HY; Kang SJ; Kwak MS; Seo JY; Song JH; Yang SY; Yang JI; Lim SH; Yim JY; Lim JH; Chung GE; Jin EH; Choi JM; Han YM; Kim JS
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Jan; 34(1):180-190. PubMed ID: 34021513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between proximal serrated polyp detection and clinically significant serrated polyps: inter-endoscopist variability.
    Parra-Pérez VF; Watanabe Yamamoto J; Nago-Nago A; Astete-Benavides M; Rodríguez-Ulloa C; Valladares-Álvarez G; Núñez-Calixto N; Yoza-Yoshidaira MA; Gargurevich-Sánchez TM; Pinto-Sánchez JF; Niebuhr-Kakiuchi JC; Uehara-Miyagusuku GA; Rodríguez-Grandez JI; Komazona-Sugajara R; Limas-Cline P; Hernández-García H; Kishimoto-Tsukazan G
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed); 2021; 86(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34272192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors.
    Waldmann E; Penz D; Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Rinner C; Jiricka L; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gut; 2021 Jul; 70(7):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 33023903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
    Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of clinically relevant serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy: results from seven cooperating centers within the German colorectal screening program.
    Schramm C; Janhsen K; Hofer JH; Toermer H; Stelzer A; Stenschke F; Stollenwerk M; Scheller I; Lang S; Goeser T; Steffen HM
    Endoscopy; 2018 Oct; 50(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 29727905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection.
    Racho RG; Krishna M; Coe SG; Thomas CS; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
    Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Jun; 62(6):1464-1471. PubMed ID: 28444509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PROXIMAL SERRATED POLYP DETECTION RATE: A COMPLEMENTARY QUALITY INDICATOR FOR ADENOMA DETECTION RATE?
    Leite FAV; Rocha LCM; Silva RRR; Vilela EG; Alberti LR; Madureira CM
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2020; 57(4):466-470. PubMed ID: 33331478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interendoscopist variability in proximal colon polyp detection is twice higher for serrated polyps than adenomas.
    Bretagne JF; Hamonic S; Piette C; Viel JF; Bouguen G
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(38):8549-8557. PubMed ID: 27784967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.
    Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.