These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32349138)

  • 1. Are adenoma and serrated polyp detection rates correlated with endoscopists' sensitivity of optical diagnosis?
    Bronzwaer MES; Vleugels JLA; van Doorn SC; Dijkgraaf MGW; Fockens P; Dekker E;
    Endoscopy; 2020 Sep; 52(9):763-772. PubMed ID: 32349138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center.
    Mandaliya R; Baig K; Barnhill M; Murugesan V; Som A; Mohammed U; Jhaveri K; Vangimalla SS; Raymond A; Tran J; Hasan L; Lewis JH; Cho W
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(9):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 31152331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening.
    Bronzwaer MES; Greuter MJE; Bleijenberg AGC; IJspeert JEG; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):465. PubMed ID: 29695244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection rates for adenomas, serrated polyps and clinically relevant serrated polyps can be easily estimated by individually calculated detection rate ratios.
    Buerger M; Kasper P; Scheller I; Hofer JH; Toermer H; Stelzer A; Stenschke F; Stollenwerk M; Allo G; Goeser T; Steffen HM; Schramm C
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):745-751. PubMed ID: 32524866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
    Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substantial and sustained improvement of serrated polyp detection after a simple educational intervention: results from a prospective controlled trial.
    Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; Bargeman M; Koornstra JJ; van Herwaarden YJ; Spaander MC; Sanduleanu S; Bastiaansen BAJ; Schoon EJ; van Lelyveld N; Dekker E; IJspeert JEG
    Gut; 2020 Dec; 69(12):2150-2158. PubMed ID: 32139550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bleijenberg AGC; Depla A; Montazeri NSM; Dekker E
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jun; 56(6):412-420. PubMed ID: 38191001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of comprehensive optical diagnosis training using Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis classification on detection of adenoma and sessile serrated lesion.
    Lee J; Bae JH; Chung SJ; Kang HY; Kang SJ; Kwak MS; Seo JY; Song JH; Yang SY; Yang JI; Lim SH; Yim JY; Lim JH; Chung GE; Jin EH; Choi JM; Han YM; Kim JS
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Jan; 34(1):180-190. PubMed ID: 34021513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between proximal serrated polyp detection and clinically significant serrated polyps: inter-endoscopist variability.
    Parra-Pérez VF; Watanabe Yamamoto J; Nago-Nago A; Astete-Benavides M; Rodríguez-Ulloa C; Valladares-Álvarez G; Núñez-Calixto N; Yoza-Yoshidaira MA; Gargurevich-Sánchez TM; Pinto-Sánchez JF; Niebuhr-Kakiuchi JC; Uehara-Miyagusuku GA; Rodríguez-Grandez JI; Komazona-Sugajara R; Limas-Cline P; Hernández-García H; Kishimoto-Tsukazan G
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed); 2021; 86(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34272192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors.
    Waldmann E; Penz D; Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Rinner C; Jiricka L; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gut; 2021 Jul; 70(7):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 33023903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
    Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of clinically relevant serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy: results from seven cooperating centers within the German colorectal screening program.
    Schramm C; Janhsen K; Hofer JH; Toermer H; Stelzer A; Stenschke F; Stollenwerk M; Scheller I; Lang S; Goeser T; Steffen HM
    Endoscopy; 2018 Oct; 50(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 29727905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection.
    Racho RG; Krishna M; Coe SG; Thomas CS; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
    Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Jun; 62(6):1464-1471. PubMed ID: 28444509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PROXIMAL SERRATED POLYP DETECTION RATE: A COMPLEMENTARY QUALITY INDICATOR FOR ADENOMA DETECTION RATE?
    Leite FAV; Rocha LCM; Silva RRR; Vilela EG; Alberti LR; Madureira CM
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2020; 57(4):466-470. PubMed ID: 33331478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interendoscopist variability in proximal colon polyp detection is twice higher for serrated polyps than adenomas.
    Bretagne JF; Hamonic S; Piette C; Viel JF; Bouguen G
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(38):8549-8557. PubMed ID: 27784967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.
    Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.