168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32349590)
1. When and where do patients with bone metastases actually break their femurs?
Sternheim A; Traub F; Trabelsi N; Dadia S; Gortzak Y; Snir N; Gorfine M; Yosibash Z
Bone Joint J; 2020 May; 102-B(5):638-645. PubMed ID: 32349590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions.
Damron TA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Brown C; Grant W; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Terek RM; Anderson ME; Cheng EY; Aboulafia AJ; Gebhardt MC; Snyder BD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 26169800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study.
Sternheim A; Giladi O; Gortzak Y; Drexler M; Salai M; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C; Yosibash Z
Bone; 2018 May; 110():215-220. PubMed ID: 29475110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can a Novel Scoring System Improve on the Mirels Score in Predicting the Fracture Risk in Patients with Multiple Myeloma?
Toci GR; Bressner JA; Morris CD; Fayad L; Levin AS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Mar; 479(3):521-530. PubMed ID: 32420721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing hip fracture risk in type-2 diabetic patients using CT-based autonomous finite element methods : a feasibility study.
Rotman D; Ariel G; Rojas Lievano J; Schermann H; Trabelsi N; Salai M; Yosibash Z; Sternheim A
Bone Joint J; 2021 Sep; 103-B(9):1497-1504. PubMed ID: 34465153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting pathological fracture in femoral metastases using a clinical CT scan based algorithm: A case-control study.
Janssen SJ; Paulino Pereira NR; Meijs TA; Bredella MA; Ferrone ML; van Dijk CN; Bramer JAM; Lozano-Calderón SA; Schwab JH
J Orthop Sci; 2018 Mar; 23(2):394-402. PubMed ID: 29128112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis potentially identifies nonessential prophylactic stabilization in femurs with metastatic disease.
Johnson JE; Goetz JE; Brouillette MJ; Miller BJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Sep; 236(9):1297-1308. PubMed ID: 35787214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FDG PET/CT Assesses the Risk of Femoral Pathological Fractures in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Ulaner GA; Zindman AM; Zheng J; Kim TW; Healey JH
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 42(4):264-270. PubMed ID: 28166159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.
Shinoda Y; Kobayashi H; Kaneko M; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Oka H; Imanishi J; Sawada R; Ogura K; Tanaka S; Haga N; Kawano H
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31521453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?
Peterson JR; Decilveo AP; O'Connor IT; Golub I; Wittig JC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):745-756. PubMed ID: 27052019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture after radiation therapy for femoral metastasis: incidence, timing and clinical features.
Shimoyama T; Katagiri H; Harada H; Murata H; Wasa J; Hosaka S; Suzuki T; Takahashi M; Asakura H; Nishimura T; Yamada H
J Radiat Res; 2017 Sep; 58(5):661-668. PubMed ID: 28992299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulating activities of daily living with finite element analysis improves fracture prediction for patients with metastatic femoral lesions.
Goodheart JR; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
J Orthop Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1226-34. PubMed ID: 25761000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simple radiographic parameter predicts fracturing in metastatic femoral bone lesions: results from a randomised trial.
van der Linden YM; Kroon HM; Dijkstra SP; Lok JJ; Noordijk EM; Leer JW; Marijnen CA;
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Oct; 69(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 14597353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cementoplasty of metastases of the proximal femur: is it a safe palliative option?
Deschamps F; Farouil G; Hakime A; Barah A; Guiu B; Teriitehau C; Auperin A; deBaere T
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1311-6. PubMed ID: 22920730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous osteosynthesis and cementoplasty for stabilization of malignant pathologic fractures of the proximal femur.
Mavrovi E; Pialat JB; Beji H; Kalenderian AC; Vaz G; Richioud B
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Jun; 98(6):483-489. PubMed ID: 28126418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The validity of the Mirels score for predicting impending pathological fractures of the lower limb.
Howard EL; Shepherd KL; Cribb G; Cool P
Bone Joint J; 2018 Aug; 100-B(8):1100-1105. PubMed ID: 30062934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High rate of fracture in long-bone metastasis: Proposal for an improved Mirels predictive score.
Crenn V; Carlier C; Gouin F; Sailhan F; Bonnevialle P;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 106(6):1005-1011. PubMed ID: 32782175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
