340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32350519)
1. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term outcome of totally minimally invasive versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Yu WQ; Zhai LX; Shi GD; Tang JY; Gao HJ; Wei YC
Asian J Surg; 2023 Sep; 46(9):3727-3733. PubMed ID: 37085421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis.
Wei ZD; Zhang HL; Yang YS; Chen LQ
J Invest Surg; 2021 Sep; 34(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 32036710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lasting symptoms and long-term health-related quality of life after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Eyck BM; Klevebro F; van der Wilk BJ; Johar A; Wijnhoven BPL; van Lanschot JJB; Lagergren P; Markar SR; Lagarde SM;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):582-588. PubMed ID: 34763951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bras Harriott C; Angeramo CA; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Dec; 164(6):e233-e254. PubMed ID: 35164948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group.
van der Wilk BJ; Hagens ERC; Eyck BM; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R; Nafteux P; Schröder W; Nilsson M; Wijnhoven BPL; Lagarde SM; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 35024794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.
Nagpal K; Ahmed K; Vats A; Yakoub D; James D; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Moorthy K; Athanasiou T
Surg Endosc; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1621-9. PubMed ID: 20108155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Casas MA; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Schlottmann F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):473-481. PubMed ID: 34955315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hybrid robotic versus hybrid laparoscopic Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a case-matched analysis.
Giulini L; Nasser CA; Tank J; Papp M; Stein HJ; Dubecz A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Jun; 59(6):1279-1285. PubMed ID: 33448299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of the surgical technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: description according to the IDEAL framework.
Stenstra MHBC; van Workum F; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Rosman C
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Mar; 32(3):. PubMed ID: 30247660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Deng J; Su Q; Ren Z; Wen J; Xue Z; Zhang L; Chu X
Onco Targets Ther; 2018; 11():6057-6069. PubMed ID: 30275710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
