These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32350519)

  • 1. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term outcome of totally minimally invasive versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
    Yu WQ; Zhai LX; Shi GD; Tang JY; Gao HJ; Wei YC
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Sep; 46(9):3727-3733. PubMed ID: 37085421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei ZD; Zhang HL; Yang YS; Chen LQ
    J Invest Surg; 2021 Sep; 34(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 32036710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lasting symptoms and long-term health-related quality of life after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Eyck BM; Klevebro F; van der Wilk BJ; Johar A; Wijnhoven BPL; van Lanschot JJB; Lagergren P; Markar SR; Lagarde SM;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):582-588. PubMed ID: 34763951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bras Harriott C; Angeramo CA; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Dec; 164(6):e233-e254. PubMed ID: 35164948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recurrence and Survival After Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.
    Henckens SPG; Schuring N; Elliott JA; Johar A; Markar SR; Gantxegi A; Lagergren P; Hanna GB; Pera M; Reynolds JV; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS;
    Ann Surg; 2024 Aug; 280(2):267-273. PubMed ID: 38577796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group.
    van der Wilk BJ; Hagens ERC; Eyck BM; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R; Nafteux P; Schröder W; Nilsson M; Wijnhoven BPL; Lagarde SM; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 35024794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safe Transition from Open to Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer Utilizing Process Management Methodology.
    Bjelovic M; Gunjic D; Babic T; Veselinovic M; Djukanovic M; Potkonjak D; Milosavljevic V
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jul; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 39124631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.
    Nagpal K; Ahmed K; Vats A; Yakoub D; James D; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Moorthy K; Athanasiou T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1621-9. PubMed ID: 20108155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Casas MA; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Schlottmann F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):473-481. PubMed ID: 34955315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid robotic versus hybrid laparoscopic Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a case-matched analysis.
    Giulini L; Nasser CA; Tank J; Papp M; Stein HJ; Dubecz A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Jun; 59(6):1279-1285. PubMed ID: 33448299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
    Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
    Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.