224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32350863)
1. Use of the Robson Ten Group Classification System to categorise operative vaginal delivery.
O'Leary BD; Kane DT; Kruseman Aretz N; Geary MP; Malone FD; Hehir MP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Dec; 60(6):858-864. PubMed ID: 32350863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National variations in operative vaginal deliveries in Ireland.
Daly N; Bonham S; O'Dwyer V; O'Connor C; Kent E; Turner MJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 24709535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of epidural analgesia on cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates classified by the Ten Groups Classification System.
Lucovnik M; Blajic I; Verdenik I; Mirkovic T; Stopar Pintaric T
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2018 May; 34():37-41. PubMed ID: 29501538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delivery mode and neonatal morbidity after remifentanil-PCA or epidural analgesia using the Ten Groups Classification System: A 5-year single-centre analysis of more than 10 000 deliveries.
Markova L; Lucovnik M; Verdenik I; Stopar Pintarič T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Oct; 277():53-56. PubMed ID: 35998385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal and Regional Variations in Operative Vaginal Delivery in Canada by Pelvic Station, 2004-2012.
Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Jul; 38(7):627-35. PubMed ID: 27591346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective cohort study of the characteristics of unsuccessful operative vaginal deliveries.
Kane D; Wall E; Malone E; Geary MP; Malone F; Kent E; McCarthy CM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jun; 285():159-163. PubMed ID: 37120912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of pelvic floor symptoms and sexual function in primiparous women who underwent operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery for second-stage arrest.
Crane AK; Geller EJ; Bane H; Ju R; Myers E; Matthews CA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2013; 19(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23321653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates at three university hospital labor units using the Robson classification system.
Zahumensky J; Psenkova P; Nemethova B; Halasova D; Kascak P; Korbel M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Jul; 146(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 31058314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.
Triunfo S; Ferrazzani S; Lanzone A; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():91-5. PubMed ID: 25898370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increasing rates of operative vaginal delivery across two decades: accompanying outcomes and instrument preferences.
Hehir MP; Reidy FR; Wilkinson MN; Mahony R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 23998554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.
Zimmo MW; Laine K; Hassan S; Bottcher B; Fosse E; Ali-Masri H; Zimmo K; Sørum Falk R; Lieng M; Vikanes Å
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022875. PubMed ID: 30361403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.
Savchenko J; Ladfors L; Hjertberg L; Hildebrand E; Brismar Wendel S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jul; 101(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 35292960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does epidural increase the incidence of cesarean delivery or instrumental labor in Saudi populations?
Bakhamees H; Hegazy E
Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 19(3):693-704. PubMed ID: 18044297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of outcomes between operative vaginal deliveries and spontaneous vaginal deliveries in southeast Nigeria.
Lawani LO; Anozie OB; Ezeonu PO; Iyoke CA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 24717812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Barčaitė E; Kemeklienė G; Railaitė DR; Bartusevičius A; Maleckienė L; Nadišauskienė R
Medicina (Kaunas); 2015 Nov; 51(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 26674145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingan D; Tan LK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Apr; 41(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 25371294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.
Ferreira EC; Pacagnella RC; Costa ML; Cecatti JG
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 129(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 25704253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification.
Pinto P; Crispín-Milart PH; Rojo E; Adiego B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():308-314. PubMed ID: 33039839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors Associated with Trial of Labour and Mode of Delivery in Robson Group 5: A Select Group of Women With Previous Caesarean Section.
Smithies M; Woolcott CG; Brock JK; Maguire B; Allen VM
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jun; 40(6):704-711. PubMed ID: 29503254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forceps, Actual Use, and Potential Cesarean Section Prevention: Study in a Selected Mexican Population.
Ayala-Yáñez R; Bayona-Soriano P; Hernández-Jimenez A; Contreras-Rendón A; Chabat-Manzanera P; Nevarez-Bernal R
J Pregnancy; 2015; 2015():489267. PubMed ID: 26380111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
