These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32351481)

  • 1. Incorporating Phylogenetic Information in Microbiome Differential Abundance Studies Has No Effect on Detection Power and FDR Control.
    Bichat A; Plassais J; Ambroise C; Mariadassou M
    Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():649. PubMed ID: 32351481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A two-stage microbial association mapping framework with advanced FDR control.
    Hu J; Koh H; He L; Liu M; Blaser MJ; Li H
    Microbiome; 2018 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 30045760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False discovery rate control incorporating phylogenetic tree increases detection power in microbiome-wide multiple testing.
    Xiao J; Cao H; Chen J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(18):2873-2881. PubMed ID: 28505251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrete False-Discovery Rate Improves Identification of Differentially Abundant Microbes.
    Jiang L; Amir A; Morton JT; Heller R; Arias-Castro E; Knight R
    mSystems; 2017; 2(6):. PubMed ID: 29181446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modifying the false discovery rate procedure based on the information theory under arbitrary correlation structure and its performance in high-dimensional genomic data.
    Rastaghi S; Saki A; Tabesh H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):57. PubMed ID: 38317067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Xu H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False discovery rate control for multiple testing based on discrete p-values.
    Chen X
    Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1060-1079. PubMed ID: 31958180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phylogenetic tree-based microbiome association test.
    Kim KJ; Park J; Park SC; Won S
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(4):1000-1006. PubMed ID: 31504188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taxallnomy: an extension of NCBI Taxonomy that produces a hierarchically complete taxonomic tree.
    Sakamoto T; Ortega JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):388. PubMed ID: 34325658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Context-Aware Phylogenetic Trees for Phylogeny-Based Taxonomy Visualization.
    Kaya G; Ezekannagha C; Heider D; Hattab G
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():891240. PubMed ID: 35664339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A powerful microbiome-based association test and a microbial taxa discovery framework for comprehensive association mapping.
    Koh H; Blaser MJ; Li H
    Microbiome; 2017 Apr; 5(1):45. PubMed ID: 28438217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure.
    Green GH; Diggle PJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article27. PubMed ID: 18052910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis.
    Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PhyloMed: a phylogeny-based test of mediation effect in microbiome.
    Hong Q; Chen G; Tang ZZ
    Genome Biol; 2023 Apr; 24(1):72. PubMed ID: 37041566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.