159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32352315)
1. Evaluation, identification and impact assessment of abnormal internal standard response variability in regulated LC-MS bioanalysis.
Fu Y; Barkley D; Li W; Picard F; Flarakos J
Bioanalysis; 2020 Apr; 12(8):545-559. PubMed ID: 32352315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Very complex internal standard response variation in LC-MS/MS bioanalysis: root cause analysis and impact assessment.
van de Merbel NC; Koster RA; Ohnmacht C
Bioanalysis; 2019 Sep; 11(18):1693-1700. PubMed ID: 31566440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inconsistent internal standard response in LC-MS/MS bioanalysis: an evaluation of case studies.
Fraier D; Ferrari L; Heinig K; Zwanziger E
Bioanalysis; 2019 Sep; 11(18):1657-1667. PubMed ID: 31556309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal standard response variations during incurred sample analysis by LC-MS/MS: Case by case trouble-shooting.
Tan A; Hussain S; Musuku A; Massé R
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2009 Oct; 877(27):3201-9. PubMed ID: 19733134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Internal standards in the quantitative determination of protein biopharmaceuticals using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.
Bronsema KJ; Bischoff R; van de Merbel NC
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2012 Apr; 893-894():1-14. PubMed ID: 22426285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic evaluation of the root cause of non-linearity in liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry bioanalytical assays and strategy to predict and extend the linear standard curve range.
Yuan L; Zhang D; Jemal M; Aubry AF
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2012 Jun; 26(12):1465-74. PubMed ID: 22592990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of in-sample calibration curve methodology for regulated bioanalysis: Critical considerations in method development, validation and sample analysis.
Yuan L; Gu H; Zeng J; Pillutla RC; Ji QC
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2020 Jan; 177():112844. PubMed ID: 31491659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of using highly pure internal standards for successful liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric bioanalytical assays.
Bergeron A; Furtado M; Garofolo F
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2009 May; 23(9):1287-97. PubMed ID: 19308966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small molecule specific run acceptance, specific assay operation, and chromatographic run quality assessment: recommendation for best practices and harmonization from the global bioanalysis consortium harmonization teams.
Woolf EJ; McDougall S; Fast DM; Andraus M; Barfield M; Blackburn M; Gordon B; Hoffman D; Inoue N; Marcelin-Jimenez G; Flynn A; LeLacheur R; Reuschel S; Santhanam R; Bennett P; Duncan B; Hayes R; Lausecker B; Sharma A; Togashi K; Trivedi RK; Vago M; White S; Barton H; Dunn JA; Farmen RH; Heinig K; Holliman C; Komaba J; Riccio MF; Thomas E;
AAPS J; 2014 Sep; 16(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 24961918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dixon's Q-test and Student's t-test to assess analog internal standard response in nonregulated LC-MS/MS bioanalysis.
Barkley D; Hatsis P; Glick J; Li W; Flarakos J
Bioanalysis; 2020 Nov; 12(21):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 33064023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of a serum total testosterone liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay calibrated to NIST SRM 971.
French D
Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Jan; 415():109-17. PubMed ID: 23085208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of microflow LC-MS/MS and its utility in quantitative discovery bioanalysis.
Zhang J; Shou W; Ogura T; Li S; Weller H
Bioanalysis; 2019 Jun; 11(11):1117-1127. PubMed ID: 31251100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Strategies for dealing with hemolyzed samples in regulated LC-MS/MS bioanalysis.
Tang D; Thomas E
Bioanalysis; 2012 Nov; 4(22):2715-24. PubMed ID: 23210654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioanalytical method development and validation: Critical concepts and strategies.
Moein MM; El Beqqali A; Abdel-Rehim M
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2017 Feb; 1043():3-11. PubMed ID: 27720355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. LC-MS/MS determination of a human mAb drug candidate in rat serum using an isotopically labeled universal mAb internal standard.
Li W; Lin H; Fu Y; Flarakos J
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2017 Feb; 1044-1045():166-176. PubMed ID: 28113139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analyte and internal standard cross signal contributions and their impact on quantitation in LC-MS based bioanalysis.
Tan A; Lévesque IA; Lévesque IM; Viel F; Boudreau N; Lévesque A
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2011 Jul; 879(21):1954-60. PubMed ID: 21680265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a stable isotopically labeled internal standard always correct analyte response? A matrix effect study on a LC/MS/MS method for the determination of carvedilol enantiomers in human plasma.
Wang S; Cyronak M; Yang E
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2007 Jan; 43(2):701-7. PubMed ID: 16959461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bioanalytical methods for the quantitation of PEGylated human insulin.
de Dios K; Manibusan A; Marsden R; Pinkstaff J
J Immunol Methods; 2013 Oct; 396(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 23933323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A homologous series of internal standards for near universal application in the discovery LC-MS/MS bioanalytical laboratory.
Heinle L; Sulaiman K; Olson A; Ruterbories K
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2020 Oct; 190():113578. PubMed ID: 32877849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving data integrity in regulated bioanalysis: proposal for a generic data transfer process for LC-MS from the European Bioanalysis Forum.
Arfvidsson C; Bedaf DV; Globig S; Knutsson M; Lewis M; McDougall S; Michi M; Timmerman P
Bioanalysis; 2020 Jul; 12(14):1033-1038. PubMed ID: 32706625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
