These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32354468)

  • 1. Comparison of urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy: A nationwide study from the National Health Insurance.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW; Jeong H; Kim H
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 158(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 32354468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1509-1521. PubMed ID: 31953731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The incidence of urologic complications requiring urologic procedure in radical hysterectomy and difference between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Kim H; Jeong HJ; Kim BW; Hwang JH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 32(6):e84. PubMed ID: 34431255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Urologic complication in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: meta-analysis of 20 studies.
    Hwang JH
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Nov; 48(17):3177-85. PubMed ID: 22824588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Is Not Superior to Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Perioperative Urologic Complications: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW; Kim SR; Kim JH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 31315060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
    Campos LS; Limberger LF; Stein AT; Kalil AN
    Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():293. PubMed ID: 24028441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
    Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004-2015.
    Liang C; Liu P; Cui Z; Liang Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 156(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 31806399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery.
    Uccella S; Laterza R; Ciravolo G; Volpi E; Franchi M; Zefiro F; Donadello N; Ghezzi F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S147-9. PubMed ID: 17720232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urinary and anal dysfunction after laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical hysterectomy.
    Laterza RM; Salvatore S; Ghezzi F; Serati M; Umek W; Koelbl H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():11-6. PubMed ID: 26313524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
    Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of long-term bowel symptoms after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer.
    He R; Xue Y; Zhuang X; Wang H; Lu Y
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Feb; 34(2):439-444. PubMed ID: 36094624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.
    Hwang JH; Lim MC; Joung JY; Seo SS; Kang S; Seo HK; Chung J; Park SY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1605-11. PubMed ID: 22531954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study.
    Wang H; Li D; Wang C; Wang X; Yu M; Zhang X; Li L; Zeng Q; Long Z; Zheng W; Liu G; Wang D
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):124. PubMed ID: 35282041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.