These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32354909)

  • 61. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
    Palatnik A; Kominiarek MA
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Pregnancy outcome after induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section.
    Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Ben-Zion M; Brezovsky A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 24749798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?
    Levy R; Zaks S; Ben-Arie A; Perlman S; Hagay Z; Vaisbuch E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 22605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
    Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Zipori Y; Grunwald O; Ginsberg Y; Beloosesky R; Weiner Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):191.e1-191.e7. PubMed ID: 30616966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. When has an induction failed?
    Simon CE; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):705-9. PubMed ID: 15802394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes.
    Alanis MC; Robinson CJ; Hulsey TC; Ebeling M; Johnson DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):262.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18771976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) and delivery outcomes in a Canadian population.
    Vinturache A; Moledina N; McDonald S; Slater D; Tough S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Dec; 14():422. PubMed ID: 25528667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Johnson DP; Davis NR; Brown AJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1565-9; discussion 1569-72. PubMed ID: 12824994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Duration of the active phase of labor in spontaneous and induced labors.
    Østborg TB; Romundstad PR; Eggebø TM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Jan; 96(1):120-127. PubMed ID: 27731890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.
    Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Landy HJ; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Grantz KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):515.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27210064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Risk of cesarean delivery among pregnant women with class III obesity.
    Borghesi Y; Labreuche J; Duhamel A; Pigeyre M; Deruelle P
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 136(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 28099722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset. A matched cohort study.
    van Gemund N; Hardeman A; Scherjon SA; Kanhai HH
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2003; 56(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 14530612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Cesarean delivery among women with prolonged labor induction.
    Highley LL; Previs RA; Dotters-Katz SK; Brancazio LR; Grotegut CA
    J Perinat Med; 2016 Oct; 44(7):759-766. PubMed ID: 26352059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?
    Heinberg EM; Wood RA; Chambers RB
    J Reprod Med; 2002 May; 47(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 12063879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Can uterocervical angles successfully predict induction of labor in nulliparous women?
    Dagdeviren E; Aslan Çetin B; Aydogan Mathyk B; Koroglu N; Topcu EG; Yuksel MA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Sep; 228():87-91. PubMed ID: 29909269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
    Dunne C; Da Silva O; Schmidt G; Natale R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20085677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.