These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32355137)

  • 21. Selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: factors influencing the selection of the optimal lowest instrumented vertebra.
    Takahashi J; Newton PO; Ugrinow VL; Bastrom TP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):1131-41. PubMed ID: 21343851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selection of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Using Fulcrum Bending Radiographs Achieved Shorter Fusion Safely Compared With the Last "Substantially" Touching Vertebra in Lenke Type 1A and 2A Curves.
    Kwan KYH; Wong CP; Koh HY; Cheung KMC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1419-E1427. PubMed ID: 31389865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selective versus hyperselective posterior fusions in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes.
    Ilharreborde B; Ferrero E; Angelliaume A; Lefèvre Y; Accadbled F; Simon AL; de Gauzy JS; Mazda K
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1739-1747. PubMed ID: 28389887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Postoperative behavior of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve and coronal balance after posterior thoracic fusion for Lenke 1C and 2C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Ishikawa M; Cao K; Pang L; Watanabe K; Yagi M; Hosogane N; Machida M; Shiono Y; Nishiyama M; Fukui Y; Matsumoto M
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jan; 20(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 25308212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for Lenke 5C scoliosis: a minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up.
    Wang Y; Bünger CE; Zhang Y; Wu C; Li H; Dahl B; Hansen ES
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):E894-900. PubMed ID: 23574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the lowest instrumented, stable, and lower end vertebrae in "single overhang" thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior versus posterior spinal fusion.
    Kuklo TR; O'Brien MF; Lenke LG; Polly DW; Sucato DS; Richards BS; Lubicky J; Ibrahim K; Kawakami N; King A;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):2232-6. PubMed ID: 16946660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selecting the LSTV as the Lower Instrumented Vertebra in the Treatment of Lenke Types 1A and 2A Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Minimal 3-year Follow-up.
    Bai J; Chen K; Wei Q; Chen Z; Chen Y; Ni H; Zhao Y; Li M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Apr; 43(7):E390-E398. PubMed ID: 28816822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection of the upper vertebra to be instrumented in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by anterior correction and fusion surgery using dual-rod instrumentation: a minimum 12-year follow-up study.
    Sudo H; Kaneda K; Shono Y; Iwasaki N
    Spine J; 2016 Mar; 16(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 26291399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiographic outcomes of anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion with thoracic pedicle screws for treatment of Lenke Type I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves.
    Potter BK; Kuklo TR; Lenke LG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(16):1859-66. PubMed ID: 16103856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flexibility assessment of the unfused thoracic segments above the "potential upper instrumented vertebrae" using the supine side bending radiographs in Lenke 5 and 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.
    Kwan MK; Chiu CK; Chan TS; Abd Gani SM; Tan SH; Chan CYW
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 28751241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fixation surgery: a comparison of two practices.
    Geck MJ; Rinella A; Hawthorne D; Macagno A; Koester L; Sides B; Bridwell K; Lenke L; Shufflebarger H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1942-51. PubMed ID: 19680102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of upper instrumented vertebra level on cervical sagittal alignment in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Ketenci IE; Yanik HS; Erdem S
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 104(5):623-629. PubMed ID: 29933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selecting the Last Substantially Touching Vertebra as Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Lenke type 2A-R and 2A-L Curves.
    Qin X; He Z; Yin R; Qiu Y; Zhu Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Mar; 45(5):309-318. PubMed ID: 32045401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Extensive Fusions for Lenke 3C and 6C Scoliosis: The Effect of Upper Instrumented Vertebra.
    Yanik HS; Ketenci IE; Erdem S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Mar; 42(6):E355-E362. PubMed ID: 27434181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Posterior correction and fusion surgery using pedicle-screw constructs for Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary report.
    Okada E; Watanabe K; Pang L; Ogura Y; Takahashi Y; Hosogane N; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 25526588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shoulder balance in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Should we fuse to the second thoracic vertebra?
    Yang H; Im GH; Hu B; Wang L; Zhou C; Liu L; Song Y
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Dec; 163():156-162. PubMed ID: 29102872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can posterior implant removal prevent device-related vertebral osteopenia after posterior fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A mean 29-year follow-up study.
    Watanabe K; Ohashi M; Hirano T; Katsumi K; Shoji H; Mizouchi T; Ishikawa Y; Hasegawa K; Endo N; Takahashi HE
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 30783802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimizing the fusion level for lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is the S-line a validated and reproducible tool to predict coronal decompensation?
    Zhang T; Shu S; Jing W; Gu Q; Zhu Z; Liu Z; Qiu Y; Sun X; Wang B; Bao H
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1935-1942. PubMed ID: 33661397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 42 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and 24 normal adolescents.
    Hiyama A; Sakai D; Watanabe M; Katoh H; Sato M; Mochida J
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3226-3233. PubMed ID: 27432428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Which thoracic curves are at the greater risk for distal adding-on: comparison between typical and atypical Lenke 1A curves.
    Yin R; Qin X; He Z; Liu Z; Qiu Y; Zhu Z
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1865-1871. PubMed ID: 33782755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.